Maine Bill Bars Teens from Chatting While Driving

June 6, 2007

  • June 6, 2007 at 9:10 am
    PLJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    YES!

    Proof televised!

  • June 6, 2007 at 9:30 am
    DWT says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I said it before and I will say it again… Don’t just ban teenagers, ban the use of cell phones period when driving. This is becoming an epidemic and unfortunately too many people are paying more attention to their conversations (or dialing) than they are to the road and the traffic around them.

    Worse still is that they have no clue just how badly they are driving!

  • June 6, 2007 at 10:19 am
    Stat Guy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    this was a IJ topic and discussion last year; one fellow was adamant about how much he needed his cellphone while driving because he increased his sales. But I can’t buy that; all I know is that there are drivers talking on the phone who do not notice they are driving too fast or they are driving too slow, often times in the passing lane. The guy in front of me is driving and waving his hands and swerving; the woman behind me is animatedly wagging her finger at someone in the ether. I can always tell when they hang up: their driving improves by getting up to speed, or get into the right lane or they use their turn signals,as they should be. I say NO CELLPHONES while driving. Is it too much to ask society to keep their conversations private, discreet and hold them at the appopriate time and place where they can devote ALL of their attention to the conversation. this is not “multi-tasking” but trying to do something dangerous (operating a motor vehicle), while being distracted….applying make up, singing with the radio, eating just do not compare to cellphone use.

  • June 6, 2007 at 12:40 pm
    Swerve says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Then no adjusting the heat or AC, no tuning the radio, no eating, no smoking. What about talking to someone else in the car? I say that’s as dangerous as talking into a cell phone. And what about pets in the car? Ban them too.

    I say that most people are just bad drivers, and NONE can hold a candle to me.

  • June 6, 2007 at 12:45 pm
    Scott says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Teenagers don’t need a cell phone to be distracted while driving. They are by definition constantly distracted. This is another case of the Government overreaching in the name of public safety.

  • June 6, 2007 at 12:49 pm
    Bill Reed says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    DWT is right on the money and Swerve is just just showing ignorance. Operating a motor vehicle is a full-time job. Even adjusting dashboard controls can be dangerous. However, it’s been proven beyond a doubt that talking on a phone is a major distraction and significantly diminishes the ability to evaluate driving situations and react safely. Just because we have technology nobody said it was appropriate to have it interfere with other priorities. Teenagers statistical risk exposure has been historically abyssmal without putting a cell phone in their hands. “Just Say No” applies to cell phones and driving.

    Swerve, being a jerk driver is nothing to be proud of.

  • June 6, 2007 at 12:54 pm
    Swerve says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yo Bill, so being a jerk IJ commentor is ok? I got yer jerk driver right here….

    No one wants to address eating, the radio, the AC, talking to friends IN THE CAR, etc., they just want cell phones banned. Why not ban eat etc? Why not arrest people for driving with one hand? When and where does it end?

  • June 6, 2007 at 2:08 am
    PLJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    These laws being past regarding the use of cellular phones is a joke at best.
    The law doesn’t work PERIOD.The people who want to comply comply.but most do not.
    Many people still speak on their phones while driving and it’s apparent that the point hasn’t gotten across so why pursue annything to do with it any further.
    IT’S A WASTE OF TIME AND TAX PAYER MONEY!
    Even law enforcement officials use their phones while driving! bCan it!

  • June 6, 2007 at 2:12 am
    DWT says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Swerve…

    Let’s take a look at what you are saying…

    How long do people spend on the phone when driving. For the sake of argument let’s ay that they are on the phone for between 3 to 5 minutes per call.

    How long does it take to adjust your heat or AC? 5 seconds?

    I agree whole heartedly that shaving or applying makeup should be a no-no.

    I even agree that eating while driving should be a no-no.

    But how long are you distracted when taking a drink? 5 seconds?

    As to talking to a someone in the car, let’s get real…

    The issue that I see is how long the people are distracted for. Granted any distraction can be serious, but when your mind is on a phone call, a pending sale, etc. for 5 plus minutes… that’s dangerous!

  • June 6, 2007 at 3:15 am
    just an observation says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    swerve: talk about road rage! you would be better off talking on the phone constantly as this would be a distraction when you see someone ahead of you talking on the phone and weaving in and out of traffic. i hope you are getting help because your reasoning is suspect. cell phones have been proven to be a monumental distraction when driving. there is no other reason for it to be brought up in legislatures all over the country. with you, however, talking on the phone is preferrable to road rage. i hope you do not carry a gun in your glove compartment.

  • June 6, 2007 at 3:34 am
    KLS says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Did anyone see the episode of Mythbusters where they compared a drunk driver and a driver on a cell phone?

    It was confirmed that being on a cell phone makes one just as dangerous behind the wheel as a drunk driver.

    They compared things like reaction time, consistency of speed and staying in the middle of the lane.

    I realize it’s only a TV show. However, after watching BOTH drivers operate their vehicles, it was hard to tell the drunk from the talker.

    Food for thought at any rate.

  • June 6, 2007 at 4:48 am
    Another Salesperson says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Agreed – The time spent and the degree of distraction on the cell phone is significantly greater than the time spent in adjusting the radio or heat, although those, too, are distrations. Wish I had seen the Drunk Driver – Cell Phone Driver comparison. I have no doubt they were equally abysmal. Maine is making a first step. The problem is the message is it’s okay for people over 18, not under 18, creating a perception that it’s just a matter of experience. I’ve had mature drivers trying to buy auto insurance from me while driving – trying to reach for their registration or license, at which point I tell them to pull off the road to continue the conversation or call me back. I explain I do not want to live with the sound of their auto crash replaying in my dreams. All states should ban all cell phone usage for all drivers. Hand free, included.

  • June 7, 2007 at 7:35 am
    Bill Reed says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    PLJ: While I agree that you can’t trust human beings to obey anything, I don’t think it reasonable to just let people get away with everything because our society and legal system has failed to find a deterrent. I ride a commuter bus from New Jersey into Manhattan. In spite of clearly posted signs that cell phone use should be for emergencies only, and requests to respect the space of other commuters, there are always a few jackasses that insist on talking the whole commute. My solution would be to throw them off the bus, or confiscate their phone. But who would ever support such draconian measures? Therein lies the problem. Our society lacks the fortitude to enforce anything. With every right, there used to be a responsibility. This concept has eroded over time. I think it’s a sad commentary that law abiding people will continue to suffer due to the arrogance and irresponsibility of a few morons.

    If we wanted to get serious about protecting the public and banning phones while driving, here’s a thought. Give the violation a serious consequence. Like having personal automobile liability policies exclude coverage if use of a cell phone is a factor in an accident. Or, a mandatory 3 year license suspension. But we all know our society doesn’t have the stomach for that. We’ll just have to get used to the carnage. Let’s make it “politically correct” and call it “collateral damage”.

  • June 7, 2007 at 7:38 am
    Swerve says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Talking into my cell phone does not require that I take my eyes off the road. Changing settings on the AC or radio does. Also, people occasionally LOOK at passengers when they talk to them, taking their eyes off the road. And you want cops pulling people over for eating while driving? Maybe the police should be arresting business owner that hire illegals rather than someone eating a burger or telling his wife on the cell that traffic has made him late.

    Why don’t you just make Castro president and we can have the govt running our entire lives instead of just our car time.

    Imagine what rush hour would be like if police were pulling people over for eating and talking on the phone.

  • June 7, 2007 at 8:53 am
    aunti everything says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Swerve, apparently you aren’t paying attention to what’s going on around you either. Cell phone users block traffic, change lanes and pull out without any concern for traffic around them far more than any other drivers. They are so caught up in their conversations that they forget to pay attention to the world. Not all drivers, but more and more all the time live on their cell phones. I can live without mine for a few minutes and I really mean live. This is a serious problem and needs to be treated seriously. I’m sorry perfect freedom to do anything you want doesn’t exist, but it can’t because what these self-absorbed individuals do affects everyone around them.

  • June 7, 2007 at 10:45 am
    PLJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Bill,

    I agree with you fully and well written statement hopefully one of our government officials reads our concerns.
    Be well!

  • June 7, 2007 at 12:17 pm
    KLS says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Swerve,

    A lot of people have memorized their AC/Heat settings and don’t have to take their eyes of the road to change them. I know how many “clicks” it is between Defrost and Vent. I know which way to turn the knob for hot or cold.

    Regarding my radio, I don’t have to take my eyes off the road to use that either. I have memorized the functions of the knobs and buttons. Easy to do, I just sat in the driveway after I got the car and played with it for a moment. Same thing with the AC.

    Therefore not everyone does take their eyes off the road to make adjustments to their radio or climate control settings.

    There are certainly plenty of morons out there who DO jack with their iPods and XM radios while they’re driving and those fools should knock it off.

    But I just wanted to let you know there are some people who can change the station without actually looking at the radio.

    I think doing ANYTHING behind the wheel in addition to driving is dumb. Driving and multi-tasking don’t mix.

    Whether a law is going to help the situation, I don’t know.

    What do you think would make an effective deterrent from people doing bone-head things behind the wheel?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*