Rhode Island Police Arrest State’s Drunkest Person Ever Recorded

July 25, 2008

Rhode Island state police say they arrested a man this week whose blood alcohol level was 0.491 percent — the highest ever recorded in Rhode Island for someone who wasn’t dead.

Stanley Kobierowski was taken to a hospital, put in the detoxification unit and sedated, said Maj. Steven O’Donnell. He was arraigned on charges of driving while intoxicated and resisting arrest, and he was released after promising to appear Friday at a court hearing.

“The person’s lucky they survived,” O’Donnell said. “There’s no doubt he would have gotten killed or killed someone if he had continued on the route he was taking.”

A phone listing for Kobierowski could not be found, and he did not have a lawyer in court.

Kobierowski, 34, of North Providence, was arrested after he drove into a highway message board on Interstate 95 in Providence, O’Donnell said.

After police arrived, Kobierowski had trouble getting out of the car, then grabbed it and refused to move, forcing troopers to carry him to the breakdown lane before taking him back to their barracks, O’Donnell said.

A breath test showed blood alcohol readings of 0.489 percent, followed by 0.491, O’Donnell said, the highest readings state officials could remember for someone who didn’t end up dead.

The legal limit in Rhode Island is 0.08. A level of 0.30 is classified as stupor, 0.4 is comatose and 0.5 is considered fatal, according to the health department.

Latest Comments

  • October 6, 2008 at 2:19 am
    Allen Beggs says:
    I think he got off way to easy. I would take the license away for 3-5 years. Take his car away and sell it (proceeds to MADD). He should be on probation for 3 years, submit... read more
  • July 28, 2008 at 12:57 pm
    Al says:
    Someone was typing drunk. I mean, p and d are nowhere near one another on the keyboard, so it can't be a typo.
  • July 28, 2008 at 12:50 pm
    Compman says:
    What's a bloop test? Did they put him in a bathtub and wait for him to go "bloop"?
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features