Mass. AG Coakley Seeks to Close Loophole in State’s Drunk-Driving Law

May 21, 2012

  • July 4, 2012 at 10:05 pm
    steve clark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Hi, Is the S.J.C.’s ruling final to date as far as the RMV not being able to impose a 3 year loss of licence, when a first oui was a CWOF and a 2nd was a refusal to take the BT?
    If this is the case as I see it, how does one go about getting the 3 year loss of licence down to 180 days from the RMV. Will the RMV notify people affected by this currently? As they notify people right away when their right to operate has been suspended??
    Thank You in advance for your repley.
    Steve Clark

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *