Rolling Stone Slams Defamation Claim in University of Virginia Rape Story

By | November 20, 2017

Rolling Stone is defending itself against a defamation lawsuit over a discredited article about a University of Virginia gang rape by arguing that members of a school fraternity knew about discrepancies in the woman’s claims weeks before the article was published and should have warned the magazine.

Lawyers for Rolling Stone argue in court documents that the fraternity and its members withheld that information from the magazine and its reporter, “at a time when disclosing such information would have prevented publication” of the woman’s allegations.

A judge had dismissed the lawsuit filed in New York by three Phi Kappa Psi members. But a federal appeals court reinstated the lawsuit in September, finding that the 2014 article, “A Rape on Campus,” could enable a reader to conclude that many or all members of the fraternity participated in gang rapes as an initiation ritual and that all members knowingly ignored the rapes.

A woman identified as “Jackie” in the article told the magazine she was raped by seven men at a fraternity house in September 2012. But an investigation by police in Charlottesville, the home of UVA’s campus, found no evidence to back up the claims.

Rolling Stone later retracted the article and apologized.

The lawsuit by the three former fraternity members was one of three defamation cases filed against the magazine over the article.

After a 2016 trial, a Virginia jury awarded $3 million in damages to an associate dean. Rolling Stone appealed, but later settled with the dean. In June, Rolling Stone settled a case filed by the Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi for $1.65 million.

The three former fraternity members were not named in the article, but in their lawsuit they say the article included certain details that could lead readers familiar with Phi Kappa Psi to identify them.

The men’s lawyers declined to comment on Rolling Stone’s defense, outlined in a Nov. 10 written court filing.

In a statement, Rolling Stone said it is “confident the case has no merit.”

“Rolling Stone has taken full responsibility for our actions in reporting Jackie’s allegations, and we wish that the fraternity and Plaintiffs would do the same,” the statement said.

The magazine also argues that the former fraternity members’ claims fail because the men did not suffer any actual harm or damages as a result of the article.

Rolling Stone, a magazine that chronicled the music and politics of the counterculture movement, is now on the market, with founder Jann Wenner planning to sell his company’s controlling stake.


Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • November 21, 2017 at 1:40 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    The Seth Rich story needed some old fashioned investigative reporting that the mainstream media would never do. As Hannity has dropped it after learning more details, why do ... read more
  • November 20, 2017 at 2:42 pm
    CJ Ramone says:
    I agree with the previous posters. The mainstream media must be accountable and must pay dearly for fake news. For example, Fox News retracted its repeated "reporting" of th... read more
  • November 20, 2017 at 2:17 pm
    Jax Agent says:
    Rolling Stone needs to be made to pay the price for their initial indifference in publishing a story that they had to know would be devastating to the young men in the fratern... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (5)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features