Qantas Moves to Take Rolls-Royce to Court over Engine Failure By Balazs Koranyi | December 2, 2010 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 2 Comments December 2, 2010 at 1:28 am Insurance Geek says: Like or Dislike: 0 0this exact situation is why the CGL exclusion n. is nick named the “sister ship” exclusion… Reply December 3, 2010 at 7:49 am P.K. says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Another “gold standard” goes down the _hitter with this debacle. One would think that a company with decades of experience and reputation for quality would know how to build AND TEST a freaking jet engine. Can’t anybody do anything right anymore? Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
this exact situation is why the CGL exclusion n. is nick named the “sister ship” exclusion…
Another “gold standard” goes down the _hitter with this debacle. One would think that a company with decades of experience and reputation for quality would know how to build AND TEST a freaking jet engine. Can’t anybody do anything right anymore?