In comments posted on the Willis website Andrew van den Born, Executive Director in Willis’ Political and Trade Credit Risks division, analyzed the potential fallout from the continued unrest in Turkey and the potential gaps in insurance coverage.
“Turkey is in the midst of the biggest anti-government street protests since Islamist-leaning Justice and Development Party (AKP) took power more than a decade ago,” he said. “But after being elected to his third term two years ago with 50 percent of the vote, besides denting his image abroad and exposing the increasing polarization of Turkish society, the last two weeks of protest is unlikely to have any immediate impact upon Erdogan’s government.”
In discussing the repercussions of the unrest van den Born said that, while the “recent concessions to suspend plans to redevelop Gezi Park as well as an investigation into police brutality may serve to defuse the crisis, any further political turmoil could put in jeopardy Turkey’s investment grade status and ultimately its ability to fund itself.
“Continuing political unrest could affect investor confidence in a country that is dependent upon foreign portfolio inflows to finance its large current account deficit,” he explained. “We have yet to witness a sudden up-tick in enquiries for political risk coverage but insurers are very much adopting a ‘wait and see’ attitude as the situation continues to unfold.”
He also identified several potential gaps in coverage. “On Saturday night, Turkey’s EU minister, Egemen Bagis, said that anyone entering Taksim square could now be considered a terrorist,” van den Born explained. “As with the riots in Thailand in 2010 and the events of the Arab Spring, the political unrest in Turkey has brought into focus once again the possible deficiencies in buying stand-alone terrorism coverage.”
Terrorism is defined in different countries in different ways. The UK’s common definition is:
“An act, including the use of force or violence, of any person or group(s) of persons, whether acting alone or on behalf of or in connection with any organization(s), committed for political, religious or ideological purposes including the intention to influence any government and / or put the public in fear for such purposes.”
In the case of Turkey, Prime Minister Erdogan’s government has labeled the protestors “terrorists.” This omits the “requirement that a terrorist act must influence or overthrow the government,” and could “possibly result in a gap in coverage although much depends on the specific wording of the relevant policy. As a result investors are recommended to consider the purchase of Political Violence Insurance which is much broader in its offering than many stand-alone terrorism products.”
Source: Willis Group Holdings
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.