If this report is true, then we need to rethink these gasses role in the climate. We are still far cooler than we were during the medieval warm trend, or the Holocene Maximum. Both of those happened in the past 8,000 years. (and both were considered “booms” for humanity.)
Scary Monsters! Wait, CO2 was this high 3 million years ago? I had no idea dinosaurs used coal for heat and drove trucks to get groceries.
You sleepy? Me too. Let me know when lefties have a real solution, one that doesn’t require me to give more of my money to liberal know-it-alls in higher gas taxes and higher energy costs for nonsense that won’t cut CO2 emissions anyway.
Hey, how about this? Something that would actually work to reduce CO2: nuclear energy and carbon taxes that are 100% returned to the taxpayers at the end of the year.
Now back to sleep everyone. If liberals can’t control our lives and money, they aren’t interested.
This is so looney it is ridiculous. I guess all those SUVs roaming the earth 3-5 million years ago were to blame. Or wait, maybe it was dinosaur farts. Good grief, the science is anything but settled. You know what these environmental wackos are after? Your money.
Pick up the Tuesday, November 27th edition of the Wall Street Journal. In it, Steven Koonin, a theoretical physicist and professor at NYU, writes an editorial examining last week’s report from the Federal government on the impact of Climate Change, the report the Insurance Journal wrote about with the headline “Report by 13 U.S. Agencies Warns of Dire Economic Effects from Climate Change”.
Mr. Koonin read that report. the fourth National Climate Assessment, and then he wrote that the economy won’t really be impacted by Climate Change, despite all the fear-mongering from the clowns in the media. And who is Steven Koonin, you ask?
He was President Obama’s secretary of energy for science.
More Scary Monsters, courtesy of Insurance Journal and other left-wing, religious non-thinkers.
Oh, please, Andrew. Take responsibility for the headlines you write at least. Take responsibility for correcting mistakes you print once in a while. No one forces you to print nonsense; you choose to do so.
Read Koonin. Then issue a correction. Otherwise, you are the problem.
I trust the WSJ. The editorial section is often from a conservative persepective (and usually against Trump policies). But the news articles are straight down the middle.
I trust PowerlineBlog, an aggregator from all over the country that includes pieces from the NYTimes and the Washington Post.
Here is a fun game I play now: Pick up any newspaper and read any article on national issues such as the environment, the economy, immigration, trade, etc. See if you can read 3 paragraphs before the article starts bashing Trump for something.
It is really challenging! And then see if you can find anything in the article to fairly explain Trump’s position, even if the writer disagrees with Trump.
If you can do both things in one article, you have a Unicorn!
November 28, 2018 at 1:48 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Craig – the WSJ is behind a pay wall. I’d like to read the Koonin article you summarized for myself. Can you please cut and paste it here so we can read the entire article for ourselves?
November 28, 2018 at 1:09 pm
rob says:
Like or Dislike:
5
0
Craig–
Your continuous insulting of Andrew is equivalent to being invited to a party, hogging the conversation, urinating on the rug, and then being upset that you were asked to leave.
Oh, my bad. Journalists should never be subject to criticism.
November 29, 2018 at 9:13 am
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
3
1
APRIL 6, 2018 AT 11:19 AM
Craig Cornell says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
1
5
Have some pride, man. Try actual insight instead of insults.
November 29, 2018 at 9:23 am
helpingout says:
Like or Dislike:
5
1
That is why I always criticize fox news, have you read the Harvard study about fake news yet craig and how the real fake news is fox news and other conservative sites? This is due to the false narratives they push without retracting stories that are shown to be false because of their lack of checking facts.
November 29, 2018 at 1:05 pm
helpingout says:
Like or Dislike:
3
0
Jack,
Did you read the report or are you giving your biased opinion. The report I am discussing talks about how when CNN and other news organizations (democratic news stations) put out a story with misinformation they normally retract the story and apologize. They do not put out as many false stories as Fox, if you believe this then you do not know the facts at hand.
November 29, 2018 at 1:09 pm
helpingout says:
Like or Dislike:
2
0
The main issue the study discusses would be how they are fact checked. When Fox is fact checked and the story is found to be spreading false information they keep it up or else they are criticized by other conservative outlets for changing the story (and the president). just look at the Pruitt interview that was drafted up that is unethical in today’s journalistic world. The left is fact checked and if it is a false story other news outlets let them know and then they update the story to the truth or retract it all together.
The news media is not the enemy of the people. That is a lie, and if you truly believe this you want propaganda and not actual news.
Read the report and you could learn something about how the news affects our society. (I have linked it in previous posts)
November 28, 2018 at 9:44 am
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
2
0
Craig – the WSJ is behind a pay wall. Unless you were posting based solely off the title of the article, you have access to the full story. Can you please cut and paste it here so we can read the entire article for ourselves?
How can anyone write, or believe, a headline that speaks such a lie? NO ONE KNOWS WHAT WAS SEEN 3-5 MILLION YEARS AGO!! There is no record, no proof. Before God created Earth it was all water. There was no life form before 5,779 years, 4 months and 8 days ago. Can’t you all just figure this out once and for all and stop with science of millions or billions of years?
If this report is true, then we need to rethink these gasses role in the climate. We are still far cooler than we were during the medieval warm trend, or the Holocene Maximum. Both of those happened in the past 8,000 years. (and both were considered “booms” for humanity.)
David- too much common sense in that statement for a lot of people on here to grasp.
Scary Monsters! Wait, CO2 was this high 3 million years ago? I had no idea dinosaurs used coal for heat and drove trucks to get groceries.
You sleepy? Me too. Let me know when lefties have a real solution, one that doesn’t require me to give more of my money to liberal know-it-alls in higher gas taxes and higher energy costs for nonsense that won’t cut CO2 emissions anyway.
Hey, how about this? Something that would actually work to reduce CO2: nuclear energy and carbon taxes that are 100% returned to the taxpayers at the end of the year.
Now back to sleep everyone. If liberals can’t control our lives and money, they aren’t interested.
This is so looney it is ridiculous. I guess all those SUVs roaming the earth 3-5 million years ago were to blame. Or wait, maybe it was dinosaur farts. Good grief, the science is anything but settled. You know what these environmental wackos are after? Your money.
Pick up the Tuesday, November 27th edition of the Wall Street Journal. In it, Steven Koonin, a theoretical physicist and professor at NYU, writes an editorial examining last week’s report from the Federal government on the impact of Climate Change, the report the Insurance Journal wrote about with the headline “Report by 13 U.S. Agencies Warns of Dire Economic Effects from Climate Change”.
Mr. Koonin read that report. the fourth National Climate Assessment, and then he wrote that the economy won’t really be impacted by Climate Change, despite all the fear-mongering from the clowns in the media. And who is Steven Koonin, you ask?
He was President Obama’s secretary of energy for science.
More Scary Monsters, courtesy of Insurance Journal and other left-wing, religious non-thinkers.
How about giving your media bashing a rest, Craig? The media
“clowns” as you call us didn’t write the report, WMO did.
Hear, hear! well said, Andrew!
Craig–Get over yourself.
Oh, please, Andrew. Take responsibility for the headlines you write at least. Take responsibility for correcting mistakes you print once in a while. No one forces you to print nonsense; you choose to do so.
Read Koonin. Then issue a correction. Otherwise, you are the problem.
We do take full responsibility for our headlines and our mistakes, always have. What news sources do you trust?
I trust the WSJ. The editorial section is often from a conservative persepective (and usually against Trump policies). But the news articles are straight down the middle.
I trust PowerlineBlog, an aggregator from all over the country that includes pieces from the NYTimes and the Washington Post.
Here is a fun game I play now: Pick up any newspaper and read any article on national issues such as the environment, the economy, immigration, trade, etc. See if you can read 3 paragraphs before the article starts bashing Trump for something.
It is really challenging! And then see if you can find anything in the article to fairly explain Trump’s position, even if the writer disagrees with Trump.
If you can do both things in one article, you have a Unicorn!
Craig – the WSJ is behind a pay wall. I’d like to read the Koonin article you summarized for myself. Can you please cut and paste it here so we can read the entire article for ourselves?
Craig–
Your continuous insulting of Andrew is equivalent to being invited to a party, hogging the conversation, urinating on the rug, and then being upset that you were asked to leave.
Oh, my bad. Journalists should never be subject to criticism.
APRIL 6, 2018 AT 11:19 AM
Craig Cornell says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
1
5
Have some pride, man. Try actual insight instead of insults.
That is why I always criticize fox news, have you read the Harvard study about fake news yet craig and how the real fake news is fox news and other conservative sites? This is due to the false narratives they push without retracting stories that are shown to be false because of their lack of checking facts.
Jack,
Did you read the report or are you giving your biased opinion. The report I am discussing talks about how when CNN and other news organizations (democratic news stations) put out a story with misinformation they normally retract the story and apologize. They do not put out as many false stories as Fox, if you believe this then you do not know the facts at hand.
The main issue the study discusses would be how they are fact checked. When Fox is fact checked and the story is found to be spreading false information they keep it up or else they are criticized by other conservative outlets for changing the story (and the president). just look at the Pruitt interview that was drafted up that is unethical in today’s journalistic world. The left is fact checked and if it is a false story other news outlets let them know and then they update the story to the truth or retract it all together.
The news media is not the enemy of the people. That is a lie, and if you truly believe this you want propaganda and not actual news.
Read the report and you could learn something about how the news affects our society. (I have linked it in previous posts)
Craig – the WSJ is behind a pay wall. Unless you were posting based solely off the title of the article, you have access to the full story. Can you please cut and paste it here so we can read the entire article for ourselves?
??? I did the research. The only way to read the full article is to pay the WSJ for access. I’m not going to do that.
No. Not doing it for dishonest people. (I get the hard paper.)
We’re ALL GOING TO DIE! (Sound familiar?)
Craig,
More ad hominem attacks directed at “lefties”? You’re boring. Go spout somewhere else, we are all tired of your nonsense.
But how could I live without reading all of your brilliant insights? Insight? (I’m still waiting?)
Yes, the old Republican scientist and Democratic scientist argument
How can anyone write, or believe, a headline that speaks such a lie? NO ONE KNOWS WHAT WAS SEEN 3-5 MILLION YEARS AGO!! There is no record, no proof. Before God created Earth it was all water. There was no life form before 5,779 years, 4 months and 8 days ago. Can’t you all just figure this out once and for all and stop with science of millions or billions of years?
gatar go
Greenhouse Effect)