Ohio High Court Backs Ex-wife’s Claim to Life Insurance Benefit

January 5, 2007

A 1990 law automatically terminating life insurance policies between married couples when they divorce doesn’t apply to policies signed before the law passed, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled this week.

In a unanimous decision, the justices said it is unconstitutional to apply the law to policies that existed before it went into effect, allowing Carol Zerkle to keep the $32,532.30 she received from a policy when her ex-husband, Michael Holycross, died in 2003.

Barbra Holycross, who was married to Michael Holycross when he died, fought Zerkle’s payout as a violation of the 1990 law, arguing that the former wife’s rights to the money were extinguished when she divorced Holycross in 1993.

Zerkle’s name had never specifically been removed from the policy, though, and the high court upheld lower court rulings that found applying the law retroactively would violate the state constitution.

Topics Ohio

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • January 8, 2007 at 2:43 am
    Mary says:
    Oh my gosh, Misty, someone disagreed with you. You had better start attacking them on a personal level since you don\'t have anything to discuss about their argument.
  • January 8, 2007 at 2:38 am
    misty meanor says:
    Bitter, party of one your table is ready. Bitter, party of one....
  • January 5, 2007 at 3:52 am
    Linda says:
    You are correct in believing that life insurance is not supposed to be \"for profit\" but let me ask you this, what if the first wife has kids from the ex too? What if she wan... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (9)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features