“Ohioans may not be aware that the collision portion of an insurance policy’s physical damage coverage does not include deer-vehicle collisions.”
Can someone please clarify? If a vehicle currently covered under a collision physical damage policy collides with another object– namely, a deer– how is this not covered? Should this really say something like “Ohioans might not realize their liability-only coverage will not pay for the damage to their own vehicle from hitting a deer?”
Very poor article….Deer collision is covered under comprehensive coverage on auto policy….not collision and not liability. Article tells you where it is not covered, but not where it is covered….Duh!
Watch Out For Deer.
Priceless.
“Ohioans may not be aware that the collision portion of an insurance policy’s physical damage coverage does not include deer-vehicle collisions.”
Can someone please clarify? If a vehicle currently covered under a collision physical damage policy collides with another object– namely, a deer– how is this not covered? Should this really say something like “Ohioans might not realize their liability-only coverage will not pay for the damage to their own vehicle from hitting a deer?”
Very poor article….Deer collision is covered under comprehensive coverage on auto policy….not collision and not liability. Article tells you where it is not covered, but not where it is covered….Duh!