Simply because certain psyche-manipulative tools, skills and opportunity are available to enrichen oneselves by others, does not mean that they should be used.
If individuals choose to live in areas where natural disastures do occur, they must be responsible to accept the high cost of insurance to cover any losses. Just as people in the Northern half of the country are paying to heat their homes in the winter, it is accepted as a cost of living. We may not like it, but as a private citizen, can you really expect to see any changes in legislation to stop insurance and oil companies?
The truth of the matter is even the existence of FEMA is \”insuring\” people to live in places they wouldn\’t ordinarily live. Without FEMA, the risk of living along the coastline would be borne by only those who could afford to lose it all. Now that the gov\’t has stepped in and given aid to all that live there, people don\’t have to worry if they can afford to lose anything…the gov\’t (and those of us smart enough to live out of harms way) will pay for their mistakes. And all this has absolutely nothing to do with Federal Flood Insurance, which is a whole different cesspool.
.
.
.
Mr. Liddy, and associates,
Simply because certain psyche-manipulative tools, skills and opportunity are available to enrichen oneselves by others, does not mean that they should be used.
http://www.femainfo.us
See the 6-2005 / 2 Billion Dollar lawsuit that Allstate Insurance is a defendent in.
If individuals choose to live in areas where natural disastures do occur, they must be responsible to accept the high cost of insurance to cover any losses. Just as people in the Northern half of the country are paying to heat their homes in the winter, it is accepted as a cost of living. We may not like it, but as a private citizen, can you really expect to see any changes in legislation to stop insurance and oil companies?
Or move to Cuba, where no private company is allowed to take unfair advantage of citizens.
No need for private companies to compete with the government when it already screws its citizenry so efficiently.
The truth of the matter is even the existence of FEMA is \”insuring\” people to live in places they wouldn\’t ordinarily live. Without FEMA, the risk of living along the coastline would be borne by only those who could afford to lose it all. Now that the gov\’t has stepped in and given aid to all that live there, people don\’t have to worry if they can afford to lose anything…the gov\’t (and those of us smart enough to live out of harms way) will pay for their mistakes. And all this has absolutely nothing to do with Federal Flood Insurance, which is a whole different cesspool.