So, because we have a corrupt organization, let’s legislate a new branch of it to monitor the corrupt one. Hmmmm… Spend more $$ instead of taking care of the corruption???? Doesn’t make much sense to me. They should be in there cleaning house not figuring out how to throw more money at the problem. I would be firing people’s ***es and putting people in place that really want to job and could do better at it. Unfortunately, it seems to be who you know or who you have pictures of….
True, but I can’t think of a news story that wouldn’t be insurance news under that logic: something might happen that might have an insurance exposure.
So, because we have a corrupt organization, let’s legislate a new branch of it to monitor the corrupt one. Hmmmm… Spend more $$ instead of taking care of the corruption???? Doesn’t make much sense to me. They should be in there cleaning house not figuring out how to throw more money at the problem. I would be firing people’s ***es and putting people in place that really want to job and could do better at it. Unfortunately, it seems to be who you know or who you have pictures of….
I find myself asking this at least once every day when reading the IJ. I guess they’re desperate for something to print.
Uh, I would guess that when planes start falling from the sky because of missed inspections, aviation insurers could answer that question for you……
True, but I can’t think of a news story that wouldn’t be insurance news under that logic: something might happen that might have an insurance exposure.
Let me try and illustrate…… “Gang Violence and Murder Up in California”. Definitely not insurance news.