In one day and out the next. you must be talking about Indiana Insurance or Frankenmuth. I don’t think that they get involved in Trade Credit Insurance.
Try Coface – they have been around for over 100 years and have representatives all over the world. More importantly they concentrate on receivable protection on various fronts so you know that they are experts at what they do – not one of the carriers that will be in this class of business today and then out tomorrow.
exactly what is this coverage? because, if this is what i think it is, why is it allowed? afterall, it’s a business. it would be like: allowing to make a product but if a company does need your product anymore, they still get $$$. how’s that fair to any market supplier? as in any business you have to be competitive and can’t soley rely on the fact that company uses only you for a supply point. if another company can make the same product and lower costs, i’d switch suppliers. what does this sound like? the automotive industry! afterall, most americans are not buying the gas hogs or SUV’s. yet, we gave our tax dollars for support?! if that product is not selling, you are losing money and eventually have to lower your costs by letting folks go or closing plants. could this have been used by the automakers? i am clueless!
In one day and out the next. you must be talking about Indiana Insurance or Frankenmuth. I don’t think that they get involved in Trade Credit Insurance.
QBE is a good market for this program.
we are an Iowa agent with one of the QBE companies. Is there anything that they can’t or won’t do? we’re very happy.
Try Coface – they have been around for over 100 years and have representatives all over the world. More importantly they concentrate on receivable protection on various fronts so you know that they are experts at what they do – not one of the carriers that will be in this class of business today and then out tomorrow.
um..
exactly what is this coverage? because, if this is what i think it is, why is it allowed? afterall, it’s a business. it would be like: allowing to make a product but if a company does need your product anymore, they still get $$$. how’s that fair to any market supplier? as in any business you have to be competitive and can’t soley rely on the fact that company uses only you for a supply point. if another company can make the same product and lower costs, i’d switch suppliers. what does this sound like? the automotive industry! afterall, most americans are not buying the gas hogs or SUV’s. yet, we gave our tax dollars for support?! if that product is not selling, you are losing money and eventually have to lower your costs by letting folks go or closing plants. could this have been used by the automakers? i am clueless!