This new office sounds like another touchy-feely Kumbaya expense with no teeth to enforce our consumer safety laws. The Chi-Comms have nore intent to send us safer products, or make reparations for the damage their goods have already caused our country, ala their refusal to compensate for losses related to Chinese drywall. Why should we have any faith that a US safety expert will show them the error in their ways?
This new office sounds like another touchy-feely Kumbaya expense with no teeth to enforce our consumer safety laws. The Chi-Comms have nore intent to send us safer products, or make reparations for the damage their goods have already caused our country, ala their refusal to compensate for losses related to Chinese drywall. Why should we have any faith that a US safety expert will show them the error in their ways?
Sorry – typo – “have no intent”