Industry Files Dog Exclusions for Homeowners Policies

February 28, 2011

A national insurance advisory organization is filing three endorsements to allow insurers to exclude personal and umbrella liability coverage for injury or damage arising from dogs.

The American Association of Insurance Services (AAIS) develops standardized policy forms and rating information used by more than 600 property/casualty insurers as the basis for policies they sell in one or more lines of insurance.

AAIS is filing an endorsement under its homeowners program that excludes coverage for bodily injury, property damage (BI/PD), and medical payments arising from direct physical contact with a canine or canines identified in the endorsement.

The endorsement must be signed by the named insured to acknowledge the limitation on coverage under the policy.

Manual information that accompanies the endorsement advises program users about using distinguishing characteristics beyond the dog’s name (which could be changed by the policyholder) to identify an animal definitively.

In addition, AAIS is filing two canine exclusions under its Personal Umbrella Program (PUP):

  • One excludes coverage entirely for BI/PD arising from direct physical contact with any canine; and
  • The other excludes such coverage with an exception allowing coverage to the extent that such BI/PD is covered by underlying insurance (or would have been covered but for the exhaustion of its limits).

The PUP exclusion with the exception is designed to correspond with the newly-filed homeowners canine exclusion. If the AAIS homeowners canine exclusion is included in the underlying insurance, the umbrella can still be written to respond to BI/PD claims from canines other than the one identified in the homeowners endorsement schedule.

Latest Comments

  • July 23, 2011 at 4:24 pm
    msmartee says:
    After first checking with AAA about American Bulldogs before buy it I found she was not an excluded dog. As 2009 American bulldogs are now excluded. What am I to do give her... read more
  • April 4, 2011 at 10:39 am
    Kirk Reisner says:
    As a past rottweiler owner I have trouble with the exclusion. Not the exclusion for a specific dog or naming a breed but this exclusion goes too far. "from direct physical c... read more
  • March 3, 2011 at 4:07 pm
    Jason Hafner says:
    I think that is a step in the right direction, and will make homeowners be more responsible with their dog ownership
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features