Poll: Is ACE-Chubb Deal Good or Bad?

July 15, 2015

The insurance industry believes that on the whole, the ACE Ltd. acquisition of Chubb Corp. is a good deal.

Industry professionals see the deal as perhaps better for the parties involved than for the property/casualty insurance industry and a better deal for ACE than for Chubb.

Thus far, 56.23 percent of respondents to a still-open InsuranceJournal.com online poll have found a reason to rate the deal as a good one in some respect, with 24.03 percent saying it is good for both of the carriers, their customers and their agents.

But 20.26 percent see it as a bad deal for the property/casualty industry, while only 6.43 percent see it as a good deal for the industry.

More respondents see it is a good deal for ACE (18.63 percent) than for Chubb (7.28 percent). A higher percentage (12.9 percent) see it as a bad deal for Chubb. Only a fraction (1.76 percent) say it’s a bad deal for ACE.

“There goes another great company,” lamented one reader.

“CEO got rich at the expense of Chubb,” said another.

“Not sure yet!” and “Too early to tell,” wrote others who are withholding judgment.

The poll began July 1 and voting is still open.

Topics Market Chubb

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • July 20, 2015 at 8:18 pm
    Pete Seamon says:
    Where can I submit a documented story regarding ACE's Penn Millers Insurance of Wilkes-Barre, PA? I've just read Christpher J Boggs Ethics article. I have a whopper of a story... read more
  • July 20, 2015 at 8:11 pm
    Pete Seamon says:
    I'd like to submit a story to your readers regarding one of ACE'S acquisitions, Penn Millers Insurance of Wilkes-Barre, PA. I've just read Christopher J Boggs' article on Ethi... read more
  • July 17, 2015 at 10:11 am
    Former Underwriter says:
    I agree with CT Agent. The upper management and employees with significant tenure that are on the Chubb lucrative pension plan will likely be bought out by ACE. That would be ... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (12)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features