5 Pending Supreme Court Cases New Justice Gorsuch Could Influence

By | April 10, 2017

Neil Gorsuch, President Donald Trump’s appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court who was confirmed by the Senate to the lifetime job on Friday in a 54-45 vote, will have an immediate impact on cases already pending before the justices.

The nine-seat court has operated with only eight justices after the death of conservative Antonin Scalia on Feb. 13, 2016, with four liberals and four conservatives. Gorsuch’s confirmation restores a 5-4 conservative majority. The new justice could cast the deciding vote in new cases before the court as well as some cases already argued during the current term that ends in June. The court could decide to hear fresh arguments in cases in which they otherwise would be split 4-4.

Here is a list of five such cases in which Gorsuch could be pivotal.

Religious rights: Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer

A case from Missouri to be argued on April 19 in which a church contends the state violated the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment guarantee of religious freedom by denying it funds for a playground project because of a state ban on aid to religious organizations.

Neil Gorsuch

Employee class-action lawsuits: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis

A significant case for business and labor on whether companies can head off costly class-action lawsuits by forcing employees to give up their right to pursue work-related legal claims as a group in court. An issue that has divided the court in the past, this case is set to be argued in the next term, which starts in October.

Housing discrimination: Bank of America v. Miami

The eight-justice court appeared closely divided when it heard arguments on Nov. 8 on whether the city of Miami could pursue lawsuits accusing major banks of predatory mortgage lending to black and Hispanic home buyers. The court may need to reargue the case with Gorsuch on board to avoid a 4-4 split.

Cross-border shooting: Hernandez v. Mesa

A 4-4 split appeared possible when the court heard arguments in this civil rights case on Feb. 21. The court has been asked to revive a civil rights lawsuit filed by the family of a Mexican teenager against a U.S. Border Patrol agent who fatally shot the 15-year-old from across the border in Texas in 2010.

Corporate liability: Jesner v. Arab Bank

In a case to be heard next term, the court agreed on Monday to consider reviving litigation that seeks to hold Arab Bank Plc financially liable for militant attacks in Israel and the Palestinian territories and accuses the Jordan-based bank of being the “paymaster” to militant groups. The question of whether companies can be held liable for actions overseas under a federal law called the Alien Tort Statute is one the court also took up in 2013 but failed to decide.

(Compiled by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

Topics Lawsuits USA Church

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • April 17, 2017 at 11:15 am
    Barry Rabkin says:
    Gorsuch is a legitimate Supreme Court Justice. There is no "stolen seat." Why? Because the Constitution does not stipulate how long (days, weeks, months, years) the Senate has... read more
  • April 17, 2017 at 10:37 am
    Ron says:
    PolarBeaRepeal, My point was that the PPACA was deemed to be constitutional by a majority of the most credentialed adjudicators this country has. If there is someone out there... read more
  • April 16, 2017 at 10:53 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Yum, Chik-Fil-a! Tastes just like fish!

Add a CommentSee All Comments (69)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features