Interesting that commercial insurance only notes their loss ratio, while personal insurance references the combined ratio…could it be that commercial insurance ran a 102.7% combined?
Bob, the last article I saw on Property Cas 360 was an overall 131% Combined Loss Ratio. Are they still putting lipstick on this pig? The only one higher was Allianz who posted a 138% Combined Loss Ratio.
I’m not sure how you can blow $200+million buying your new CEO and his current company ties while declining expenses $400ml. Something doesn’t sound right with their foggy math. I am voting for lipstick on a pig!
Interesting that commercial insurance only notes their loss ratio, while personal insurance references the combined ratio…could it be that commercial insurance ran a 102.7% combined?
Bob, the last article I saw on Property Cas 360 was an overall 131% Combined Loss Ratio. Are they still putting lipstick on this pig? The only one higher was Allianz who posted a 138% Combined Loss Ratio.
I’m not sure how you can blow $200+million buying your new CEO and his current company ties while declining expenses $400ml. Something doesn’t sound right with their foggy math. I am voting for lipstick on a pig!