Unfailing Liberal Logic: 1. Innocent people die. 2. Find a conservative to blame who has nothing to do with it. 3. Slander is the preferred choice of attack. 4. Reveal complete lack of care to solve the problem. 5. Wait for next group of innocent people to die. 6. Repeat.
yeah, you ranting about the Left on pretty much every article is certainly helping to fix all the division in this country. You sure sound bitter. Why not follow Trump’s example and start trying to bring everyone back together?
Craig is reacting to the accusations of Conservatives, Trump, etc. for causing shootings. THAT is what is causing division; i.e. Liberal Socialists started finger pointing. Craig outlined their pattern.
Your reaction propels the division to another level.
Yogi, you’re just as bad if not worse…constantly ranting about Liberals / Socialists etc., pushing your little conspiracy theories and ultimately offering absolutely no solutions, only attacks because “they started it first.” You, Craig and Agent are main reasons Andrew will probably end up shutting down this forum–because you can’t just stick to insurance.
You’re obviously a very intelligent person and when you DO share your insights into INSURANCE (or health care, actually), there are few on here I’d rather listen to. .Sure is a shame you can’t get away from the “us vs them” mentality about everything.
In some cases, sure, I agree with you. In most cases, it is simply hands thrown in the air saying there is nothing fundamental or transitional we can do.In most cases, it’s a cop out.
It’s gotten to be an insincere response that is almost expected of us, thus making it shallow. Some people are sincere in their prayers and do pray for others situations though.
August 7, 2019 at 1:38 pm
UW says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
31
18
Unfailing Craig Cornell Logic: 1. Read news 2. Blame party he doesn’t support (democrats, liberals, etc.) 3. Bury head 4. Repeat
Do you ever strive to learn/see things from another perspective, or do you enjoy posting your biased comments on every article you read? (Rhetorical question – we all know the answer for you (& Agent) on these forums).
Did you make the same comments about Nicole Wallace, etc.? Do you ever strive to see the ORIGIN of the division? No Conservative blamed a Liberal in this matter. The opposite occurred.
I wonder why Insurance Journal deleted my accurate response: because Pizzagate wasn’t pushed by a what USED to be the most-respected source of news in the country: the N Y Times.
It was pushed by clowns on Infowars, conspiracy theorists that barely a tiny fraction of the country even pays attention to.
Question: why was the truth deleted by IJ? (I’ll ask Google.)
So does that mean it’s okay to post lies and falsehoods as long as you only have a tiny fraction of the market share? Seems like it shouldn’t matter if it’s the NY TImes, Fox News, InfoWars, CNN, MSNBC, Breitbart, etc … the same defamation or liable laws should apply to every one and every business the same way.
August 9, 2019 at 5:37 pm
bob says:
Like or Dislike:
4
4
“So does that mean it’s okay to post lies and falsehoods as long as you only have a tiny fraction of the market share? Seems like it shouldn’t matter if it’s the NY TImes, Fox News, InfoWars, CNN, MSNBC, Breitbart, etc … the same defamation or liable laws should apply to every one and every business the same way.”
This so blatantly misses the point it is absurd.
He is stating that it is crazy that a once respectable site now lies, and now even crazy sites that lie are being more accurate than the New York Times.
As for what you say on it should apply to every business: Then why doesn’t it? The only valid criticism I hear is when people blast Fox news. You don’t say anything when Planet says that, do you Rosenblatt?
I wonder why?
August 9, 2019 at 12:54 pm
Craig Cornell says:
Like or Dislike:
6
7
Well, Rosenblatt, if you post a lie and the NY Times posts a lie, I think the bigger impact is the lie from the NY Times.
Get some perspective dude. And if you don’t stand up against slander by both, then ask yourself about your own values.
Just because you don’t like Sarah Palin doesn’t mean you shouldn’t say something about her being slandered. Unless you are a Partisan Hack with no principles at all.
I’m just tired of this board allowing Craig’s personal attacks against others but then deleting anything attacking him. It shows a very prejudiced culture at Insurance Journal which is just sad.
Yes, he clearly is the one personally attacking others more than anyone else out here, which last time I checked:
JUNE 25, 2019 AT 8:49 PM
Andrew G. Simpson says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
0
0
This is a reminder of the comment section rules that are meant to encourage civil discourse. In particular, please be advised that ad hominem or other personal attacks against other users are a violation of the rules of the forum, even when the attacks are included in otherwise on-topic comments. Personal attacks include targeting another with offensive, obscene, libelous, defamatory or threatening language or slurs; assigning false or unwanted labels to another; questioning another’s character, integrity, morals or intelligence; disclosing another’s personal information; or assuming or assigning to another user a particular political, personal, social, religious or other motive.
Also, comments that are part of extended and repetitive squabbles between two and/or among small cliques of commenters are also inappropriate use of this forum.
This forum is also to be used only in a noncommercial manner.
In short, please address topics and express opinions while refraining from labeling or negatively or falsely characterizing others with whom you may disagree. If you can’t state your view without insulting another user, don’t state it.
Users remain solely responsible for the content of their communications. Insurance Journal has the right but not the obligation to monitor and edit or remove any forum comments or content.
Insurance Journal has the right to suspend access to the firm for those who violate the terms of participation.
wow…3 articles have had their comments section shut down. Methinks it’s the beginning of the end of the IJ comments section. If and when it happens I shall miss you all, even the ones with whom I disagree, and wish you ALL great financial success, financial stability, and happiness.
Well, maybe IJ is showing some balance. The last post was shut down after I was called a Racist and a Misogynist and a White Supremacist. (All hilarious claims if you knew me in person.)
But I’m sure the person calling me those names was Tolerant and Understanding. . . just ask him.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
yeah, you ranting about the Left on pretty much every article is certainly helping to fix all the division in this country. You sure sound bitter. Why not follow Trump’s example and start trying to bring everyone back together?
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Yogi, you’re just as bad if not worse…constantly ranting about Liberals / Socialists etc., pushing your little conspiracy theories and ultimately offering absolutely no solutions, only attacks because “they started it first.” You, Craig and Agent are main reasons Andrew will probably end up shutting down this forum–because you can’t just stick to insurance.
You’re obviously a very intelligent person and when you DO share your insights into INSURANCE (or health care, actually), there are few on here I’d rather listen to. .Sure is a shame you can’t get away from the “us vs them” mentality about everything.
The article is NOT about insurance. Who published it?
Thoughts and prayers says what?
yep, knew you couldn’t do it.
It says the person is thinking about their sorrow and suffering, and is praying to God to help them through their turmoil and pain.
In some cases, sure, I agree with you. In most cases, it is simply hands thrown in the air saying there is nothing fundamental or transitional we can do.In most cases, it’s a cop out.
It’s gotten to be an insincere response that is almost expected of us, thus making it shallow. Some people are sincere in their prayers and do pray for others situations though.
Unfailing Craig Cornell Logic: 1. Read news 2. Blame party he doesn’t support (democrats, liberals, etc.) 3. Bury head 4. Repeat
Do you ever strive to learn/see things from another perspective, or do you enjoy posting your biased comments on every article you read? (Rhetorical question – we all know the answer for you (& Agent) on these forums).
Did you make the same comments about Nicole Wallace, etc.? Do you ever strive to see the ORIGIN of the division? No Conservative blamed a Liberal in this matter. The opposite occurred.
Did you read the article this is attached to? Sarah Palin was blantantly lied about by the NEW YORK TIMES!
She may not win the case because of libel protections for “journalists”, but she clearly was defamed.
You good with that?
Wonder why nobody is suing anyone for defamation over Pizzagate
No.
“no” what?
I wonder why Insurance Journal deleted my accurate response: because Pizzagate wasn’t pushed by a what USED to be the most-respected source of news in the country: the N Y Times.
It was pushed by clowns on Infowars, conspiracy theorists that barely a tiny fraction of the country even pays attention to.
Question: why was the truth deleted by IJ? (I’ll ask Google.)
So does that mean it’s okay to post lies and falsehoods as long as you only have a tiny fraction of the market share? Seems like it shouldn’t matter if it’s the NY TImes, Fox News, InfoWars, CNN, MSNBC, Breitbart, etc … the same defamation or liable laws should apply to every one and every business the same way.
“So does that mean it’s okay to post lies and falsehoods as long as you only have a tiny fraction of the market share? Seems like it shouldn’t matter if it’s the NY TImes, Fox News, InfoWars, CNN, MSNBC, Breitbart, etc … the same defamation or liable laws should apply to every one and every business the same way.”
This so blatantly misses the point it is absurd.
He is stating that it is crazy that a once respectable site now lies, and now even crazy sites that lie are being more accurate than the New York Times.
As for what you say on it should apply to every business: Then why doesn’t it? The only valid criticism I hear is when people blast Fox news. You don’t say anything when Planet says that, do you Rosenblatt?
I wonder why?
Well, Rosenblatt, if you post a lie and the NY Times posts a lie, I think the bigger impact is the lie from the NY Times.
Get some perspective dude. And if you don’t stand up against slander by both, then ask yourself about your own values.
Just because you don’t like Sarah Palin doesn’t mean you shouldn’t say something about her being slandered. Unless you are a Partisan Hack with no principles at all.
I’m just tired of this board allowing Craig’s personal attacks against others but then deleting anything attacking him. It shows a very prejudiced culture at Insurance Journal which is just sad.
Yes, he clearly is the one personally attacking others more than anyone else out here, which last time I checked:
JUNE 25, 2019 AT 8:49 PM
Andrew G. Simpson says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
0
0
This is a reminder of the comment section rules that are meant to encourage civil discourse. In particular, please be advised that ad hominem or other personal attacks against other users are a violation of the rules of the forum, even when the attacks are included in otherwise on-topic comments. Personal attacks include targeting another with offensive, obscene, libelous, defamatory or threatening language or slurs; assigning false or unwanted labels to another; questioning another’s character, integrity, morals or intelligence; disclosing another’s personal information; or assuming or assigning to another user a particular political, personal, social, religious or other motive.
Also, comments that are part of extended and repetitive squabbles between two and/or among small cliques of commenters are also inappropriate use of this forum.
This forum is also to be used only in a noncommercial manner.
In short, please address topics and express opinions while refraining from labeling or negatively or falsely characterizing others with whom you may disagree. If you can’t state your view without insulting another user, don’t state it.
Users remain solely responsible for the content of their communications. Insurance Journal has the right but not the obligation to monitor and edit or remove any forum comments or content.
Insurance Journal has the right to suspend access to the firm for those who violate the terms of participation.
Scoreboard says I am tied with Kangaroo for most personal attacks. (But mine get deleted. Hmm.)
Please point out some of the personal attacks you reference. . . won’t wait up.
wow…3 articles have had their comments section shut down. Methinks it’s the beginning of the end of the IJ comments section. If and when it happens I shall miss you all, even the ones with whom I disagree, and wish you ALL great financial success, financial stability, and happiness.
Well, maybe IJ is showing some balance. The last post was shut down after I was called a Racist and a Misogynist and a White Supremacist. (All hilarious claims if you knew me in person.)
But I’m sure the person calling me those names was Tolerant and Understanding. . . just ask him.
Love the Down Vote! (Hate much?)