So, what about commenting on insurance instead of politics? Oh, wait! You don’t visit this board to discuss insurance. Your only concerns here are Climate Change, marIJuana legalization, and Trump bashing. Never mind, troll. {attorney advised of this post}
Is this before or after the commerce secretary threatened to fire people pointed politically at the NOAA unless they reversed their contradiction of trump?
Blatantly false. It’s 100% related, how can you say it’s irrelevant with a straight face? You are literally just saying “NUH-UH” to things that disprove your point, of which there are many. You are a joke.
September 13, 2019 at 3:32 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
2
6
There is a modeled path that is independent of any threat of termination by anyone against anyone. THAT is the only relevant point.
September 16, 2019 at 10:59 am
Jon says:
Like or Dislike:
4
1
NONSENSE JUSTIFICATION FOR HYPOCRISY
Nothing else really, you’re just a hypocrite. The two issues are clearly related, you’re just refusing to acknowledge a statement that destroys your argument, you’re still wrong.
September 13, 2019 at 3:47 pm
bob says:
Like or Dislike:
4
4
That is not at all what happened, and they did that because specifically of the fact that they were trying to contradict Trump. These guys at the NOAA are perfectly ok with contradicting Trump, if they are CORRECT. In this scenario, it was political to try and say he was wrong. The famous sharpie comment doesn’t matter, because he was paying attention to multiple charts and it was highlighted in a way that made more sense than the multiple line versions.
The media messed up on this, and so did every person that did Sharpie Gate. Will you ever criticize Trump’s critics helping? This is absurd. I would join your side if you showed balance. You have none.
Once again, you’re avoiding things like facts and logic. Things straight up did not happen how you’re saying. Several of us myself included have already posted our evidence below. I like how you just try to argue without actuallyciting any evidence though. This isn’t the media, this is right-wing fanaticism and children who can’t admit when they’re wrong.
September 11, 2019 at 9:42 am
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
10
5
The chief scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said he is looking into “potential violations” of scientific integrity in the way the agency responded to President Trump’s claims that Hurricane Dorian posed a threat to Alabama. Craig McLean, NOAA’s acting chief scientist, wrote an email to colleagues that said the agency’s statement Friday backing up Mr. Trump’s claims was “political” and a “danger to public health and safety.”
“I am pursuing the potential violations of our NOAA Administrative Order on Scientific Integrity,” McLean wrote in the email, which was obtained by CBS News. The letter was first reported by the Washington Post.
McLean’s letter criticized the NOAA statement, writing: “The content of this press release is very concerning as it compromises the ability of NOAA to convey life-saving information necessary to avoid substantial and specific danger to public health and safety.”
“If the public cannot trust our information, or we debase our forecaster’s warnings and products, that specific danger arises,” McLean wrote.
AUGUST 20, 2018 AT 11:28 AM
PolarBeaRepeal says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
0
0
Wrong. Few people care about your off-topic rants. Please offer constructive criticism of the article’s suggestion instead of attacking people posting opinions that are opposite of yours.
Once again, you keep making these statements without responding to any of the valid arguments against your side. You did not read the Mueller report, we’ve established this in previous arguments.
You LITERALLY posted NPR up above to try and make your point, but now you ignore them because they disagree with you? You are a joke LOL.
September 13, 2019 at 1:13 pm
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
5
3
Yogi wrote, ”
SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 AT 9:52 AM
PolarBeaRepeal says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
Thumb up 0Thumb down 3
Nope. NPR is the Liberal’s Lapdog. No credibility, and will soon be without govt funding, so it will have to survive on merit, not taxpayer subsidies.”
But days earlier, sourced:
SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 AT 8:49 AM
PolarBeaRepeal says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
Thumb up 1Thumb down 8
“So, what about the president and his mock hurricane warning to Alabama?”
Up is down, left is right, dog and cats living together!
September 13, 2019 at 1:57 pm
Jon says:
Like or Dislike:
6
4
Polar, if your own posts (from what a day ago?) can be used to argue against your most recent post, you might be a hypocrite.
September 13, 2019 at 2:47 pm
Jon says:
Like or Dislike:
5
4
Personally, I think my series of “You might be a hypocrite…” comments where I just post things Polar has actually done was hilarious, but apparently IJ moderators don’t think so.
September 13, 2019 at 3:34 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
4
3
The NPR article I previously posted was ECHOED by several other sources. I used NPR to show they agreed with others, despite their liberal leanings. Review other sources for the same info as was published by NPR.
September 13, 2019 at 3:35 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
3
4
Time and CBS are also politically biased orgs.
September 14, 2019 at 5:41 pm
Jon says:
Like or Dislike:
5
2
LOL you just don’t like that fact is politically biased these days. The facts are against you, and you know it and you’re just denying to try and save face. Cowardly, is what it is. You’ve been proven wrong multiple times on this and other posts but you refuse to ever be a man and acknowledge your mistakes. Pathetic.
September 15, 2019 at 10:41 am
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
4
2
Yogi wrote, ” I used NPR to show they agreed with others, despite their liberal leanings.”
I believe that as much as I believe all the property in the US is insured to value.
September 11, 2019 at 5:09 pm
CommLinesManager says:
Like or Dislike:
5
5
So when are you gonna tell us where you and Craig are registered? I’d love to send a gift.
My favorite part is how Polar will post this kind of garbage, immediately be met with evidence to the contrary and then just go silent but keep posting his garbage in other threads on the same article. As if he hasn’t just been proven wrong, or as if the fact that he’s proven wrong doesn’t count as long as he doesn’t acknowledge it. Speaks of cowardice in my opinion but that’s just me.
LOL I actually have posted things relevant to the article and discussion, you just wanted to yell about your political opinion while disregarding fact entirely. Nice try though LOL maybe go golfing instead? Clearly you’re on the end of your career, it doesn’t seem like you’re keeping things together very well, maybe retirement?
So, what about the president and his mock hurricane warning to Alabama?
Just cant help your self.
To be fair (no pun intended) to Cap’n, that was pretty funny.
You are correct, FFA, the headline was too tempting.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Is this before or after the commerce secretary threatened to fire people pointed politically at the NOAA unless they reversed their contradiction of trump?
irrelevant to the issue I documented in the link I provided.
Blatantly false. It’s 100% related, how can you say it’s irrelevant with a straight face? You are literally just saying “NUH-UH” to things that disprove your point, of which there are many. You are a joke.
There is a modeled path that is independent of any threat of termination by anyone against anyone. THAT is the only relevant point.
NONSENSE JUSTIFICATION FOR HYPOCRISY
Nothing else really, you’re just a hypocrite. The two issues are clearly related, you’re just refusing to acknowledge a statement that destroys your argument, you’re still wrong.
That is not at all what happened, and they did that because specifically of the fact that they were trying to contradict Trump. These guys at the NOAA are perfectly ok with contradicting Trump, if they are CORRECT. In this scenario, it was political to try and say he was wrong. The famous sharpie comment doesn’t matter, because he was paying attention to multiple charts and it was highlighted in a way that made more sense than the multiple line versions.
The media messed up on this, and so did every person that did Sharpie Gate. Will you ever criticize Trump’s critics helping? This is absurd. I would join your side if you showed balance. You have none.
Once again, you’re avoiding things like facts and logic. Things straight up did not happen how you’re saying. Several of us myself included have already posted our evidence below. I like how you just try to argue without actuallyciting any evidence though. This isn’t the media, this is right-wing fanaticism and children who can’t admit when they’re wrong.
The chief scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said he is looking into “potential violations” of scientific integrity in the way the agency responded to President Trump’s claims that Hurricane Dorian posed a threat to Alabama. Craig McLean, NOAA’s acting chief scientist, wrote an email to colleagues that said the agency’s statement Friday backing up Mr. Trump’s claims was “political” and a “danger to public health and safety.”
“I am pursuing the potential violations of our NOAA Administrative Order on Scientific Integrity,” McLean wrote in the email, which was obtained by CBS News. The letter was first reported by the Washington Post.
McLean’s letter criticized the NOAA statement, writing: “The content of this press release is very concerning as it compromises the ability of NOAA to convey life-saving information necessary to avoid substantial and specific danger to public health and safety.”
“If the public cannot trust our information, or we debase our forecaster’s warnings and products, that specific danger arises,” McLean wrote.
So, Yogi, there is that.
AUGUST 20, 2018 AT 11:28 AM
PolarBeaRepeal says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
0
0
Wrong. Few people care about your off-topic rants. Please offer constructive criticism of the article’s suggestion instead of attacking people posting opinions that are opposite of yours.
Once again, you keep making these statements without responding to any of the valid arguments against your side. You did not read the Mueller report, we’ve established this in previous arguments.
ahhhh, the old “Deep State” conspiracy again! Unreal. Newsflash: THERE. IS. NO. DEEP. STATE.
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/09/759209532/noaa-chief-scientist-says-move-to-contradict-agency-and-back-trump-was-political Like how you missed this one.
Nope. NPR is the Liberal’s Lapdog. No credibility, and will soon be without govt funding, so it will have to survive on merit, not taxpayer subsidies.
LOL you’re the one who tried to make your point with an NPR article.
https://time.com/5672563/noaa-trump-alabama-hurricane-dorian/
How about TIME?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/noaa-s-chief-scientist-probe-agency-s-defense-trump-s-n1051626
NBC?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/noaa-hurricane-dorian-statements-president-donald-trump-claims-being-investigated-by-chief-scientist/
CBS?
The point is it doesn’t matter who the article is from. You’re so closed to the fact that you’re wrong that you’re going to deny anything. I could literally post a video of Trump admitting that it was political and he threatened to fire people and you would deny it was relevant. If you’re not going to actually debate why not go find a hobby? I hear knitting is a favorite in your demographic.
You LITERALLY posted NPR up above to try and make your point, but now you ignore them because they disagree with you? You are a joke LOL.
Yogi wrote, ”
SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 AT 9:52 AM
PolarBeaRepeal says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
Thumb up 0Thumb down 3
Nope. NPR is the Liberal’s Lapdog. No credibility, and will soon be without govt funding, so it will have to survive on merit, not taxpayer subsidies.”
But days earlier, sourced:
SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 AT 8:49 AM
PolarBeaRepeal says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
Thumb up 1Thumb down 8
“So, what about the president and his mock hurricane warning to Alabama?”
Why don’t you ask the NOAA and its President?
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/06/758532041/noaa-contradicts-weather-service-backs-trump-on-hurricane-threat-in-alabama
Reply
Up is down, left is right, dog and cats living together!
Polar, if your own posts (from what a day ago?) can be used to argue against your most recent post, you might be a hypocrite.
Personally, I think my series of “You might be a hypocrite…” comments where I just post things Polar has actually done was hilarious, but apparently IJ moderators don’t think so.
The NPR article I previously posted was ECHOED by several other sources. I used NPR to show they agreed with others, despite their liberal leanings. Review other sources for the same info as was published by NPR.
Time and CBS are also politically biased orgs.
LOL you just don’t like that fact is politically biased these days. The facts are against you, and you know it and you’re just denying to try and save face. Cowardly, is what it is. You’ve been proven wrong multiple times on this and other posts but you refuse to ever be a man and acknowledge your mistakes. Pathetic.
Yogi wrote, ” I used NPR to show they agreed with others, despite their liberal leanings.”
I believe that as much as I believe all the property in the US is insured to value.
So when are you gonna tell us where you and Craig are registered? I’d love to send a gift.
My favorite part is how Polar will post this kind of garbage, immediately be met with evidence to the contrary and then just go silent but keep posting his garbage in other threads on the same article. As if he hasn’t just been proven wrong, or as if the fact that he’s proven wrong doesn’t count as long as he doesn’t acknowledge it. Speaks of cowardice in my opinion but that’s just me.
“… will post this kind of garbage…”
go silent …. to work, not troll IJ all day like some others…
LOL I actually have posted things relevant to the article and discussion, you just wanted to yell about your political opinion while disregarding fact entirely. Nice try though LOL maybe go golfing instead? Clearly you’re on the end of your career, it doesn’t seem like you’re keeping things together very well, maybe retirement?
Don’t know, don’t know