I always find it amazing that even though the law is crystal clear the lawyers can still tie the suits up in the courts for extended periods of time. The gun is no more to blame in these cases than the car is in a typical auto accident.
That weak argument from the gun fans in this country gets weaker with every mass shooting, and every day the data from countries that have banned firearms or at the least assault rifles. And, you know, common sense. Things gun fans generally lack.
Jon,
As long as the second amendment remains I guess you are stuck with us gun fans. If you think that countries with stricter gun laws are better then you are free to look into moving either that or more difficult would be to repeal the second amendment.
Finally before you use the term assault weapon you should really understand what it is. That being a firearm typically a rifle cable of firing more than one shot per pull of the trigger. Last I checked an AR 15 requires the operator of the weapon to pull the trigger for each shot fired.
So you want to talk about the second amendment. Great. What about the 1st amendment? Or the 13th amendment? You gun nuts seem to love the constitution when it involves guns, but suddenly go blind deaf and dumb on other constitutional issues, why is that? Maybe because you’re all self-serving hypocrites.
Either way, the data is out there. As much as gun nuts try to argue otherwise, the data very plainly sees countries with stricter gun laws have less gun violence. So why do you want to keep letting americans die? So you can hunt? Or because you’re really just another scared little boy without your guns? I think we all know the answer.
I always find it amazing that even though the law is crystal clear the lawyers can still tie the suits up in the courts for extended periods of time. The gun is no more to blame in these cases than the car is in a typical auto accident.
That weak argument from the gun fans in this country gets weaker with every mass shooting, and every day the data from countries that have banned firearms or at the least assault rifles. And, you know, common sense. Things gun fans generally lack.
Terrible analogy. Mechanical defect is found to be cause in 12-13% of all automobile accidents.
mrbob said “typical”. 12% is not “typical”
Jon,
As long as the second amendment remains I guess you are stuck with us gun fans. If you think that countries with stricter gun laws are better then you are free to look into moving either that or more difficult would be to repeal the second amendment.
Finally before you use the term assault weapon you should really understand what it is. That being a firearm typically a rifle cable of firing more than one shot per pull of the trigger. Last I checked an AR 15 requires the operator of the weapon to pull the trigger for each shot fired.
So you want to talk about the second amendment. Great. What about the 1st amendment? Or the 13th amendment? You gun nuts seem to love the constitution when it involves guns, but suddenly go blind deaf and dumb on other constitutional issues, why is that? Maybe because you’re all self-serving hypocrites.
Either way, the data is out there. As much as gun nuts try to argue otherwise, the data very plainly sees countries with stricter gun laws have less gun violence. So why do you want to keep letting americans die? So you can hunt? Or because you’re really just another scared little boy without your guns? I think we all know the answer.