The Florida Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in a challenge to Gov. Rick Scott’s suspension of state rulemaking.
The case heard Wednesday was filed on behalf of Rosalie Whiley, who is blind. She said the freeze delayed a rule that would have made it easier for her to reapply for food stamps.
Former Florida State University President Talbot “Sandy” D’Alemberte is representing Whiley. D’Alemberte is also a former American Bar Association president.
Scott’s general counsel, Charles Trippe, argued for the governor.
D’Alemberte contends Scott exceeded his authority by suspending laws on rulemaking by state agencies. Trippe says Scott acted within constitutional limits.
Scott froze the process when he took office in January to determine if any proposed rules might conflict with his pro-business agenda.
Topics Florida Legislation
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Delta Probing Unauthorized Wi-Fi on Flight After Hacker Event 
Viewpoint: Is it Time to Rethink the ‘Secondary-Peril’ Label and Reclassify Risk? 
Drivers of Mercedes AMG Cars File Class Action Over Burn Hazard From Logo on Seat 
Rhine River Shipping Stalls as Water Level Hits Record Low 
