The caps are due to the dangers of the medical treatment being dispensed. If the current law is unconstitutional, it can be re-written to achieve the desired purpose of protecting the public from the possibility that marIJuana will be illegally dispensed for recreational purposes through one or more of the dispensaries.
Lol, it is IMPOSSIBLE for medical dispensaries to sell marijuana illegally to random people without a prescription. Ridiculous! You must be the “conspiracy theorist” type. Maybe you misread the article? I don’t get it.
Impossible for marIJuana to be sold illegally to random people without a prescription?! Have you ever heard of accountants, bank tellers, cashiers embezzling money? Or, did you ever read about retail workers caught taking merchandise and selling it outside the store? Is that impossible, too? If you believe embezzlement and theft occurs, you too must be a conspiracy theorist. (sarcasm)
aren’t you the same guy who used to rant about BOTs and people funded by George Soros constantly switching their IP addresses to downvote conservatives in order to censor their views from the IJ?
if this is in fact true that you have evidence that people were using BOTs to numerously downvote conservative posts, I will humbly apologize.. Please post your correspondence between you and Mr. Simpson.
July 19, 2019 at 1:34 pm
APOLLOar 11 Bear says:
Like or Dislike:
4
2
YOU need to contact Simpson, not me.
July 19, 2019 at 1:53 pm
ralph says:
Like or Dislike:
1
4
YOU’RE the one who said he corroborated your claim about BOTs funded by Soros, Yogi. The onus is on you to prove it.
July 16, 2019 at 1:50 pm
Captain Planet says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18
4
“…violated the voter-approved…”
Pretty much all you need to see here. Floridian voters have spoken.
Actually, readers will see the words ‘medical’ in front of marIJuana and realize by logical deduction that the Florida voters did NOT approve recre-pot. Well, some Florida stoners will struggle with the ‘deduction’ part.
All I need to do is speculate that MEDI-POT dispensaries may sell medi-pot illegally, or its workers take some of the medi-pot illegally and sell it outside the dispensaries. Ever hear of ‘shrinkage’ in food stores or plant nurseries?
Yeah buddy, I am aware that employee pilferage occurs, but that has nothing to do with the comment we’re replying to where you said “readers will see the words ‘medical’ in front of marIJuana and realize…that the Florida voters did NOT approve recre-pot.”
July 19, 2019 at 1:35 pm
APOLLOar 11 Bear says:
Like or Dislike:
1
3
Shrinkage may occur in medi-pot dispensaries, so THERE IS REASON for concern over illegal disbursement of medi-pot to recre-stoners. The rest of your post is diversion from this simple point.
July 19, 2019 at 1:48 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
2
3
Did I say your concern was invalid? No. Did I agree with your concern? Yup. Did I say you are failing to reply to the content of what this part of the thread is about (your argument that the title is misleading)? Yup. And you still are.
July 22, 2019 at 1:53 pm
Jax Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
1
1
“When 71 percent of Floridians voted for access to this life-changing medicine, they didn’t expect restrictive legislation that stood in the way of progress and open markets.” Nikki Fried, Ag Commissioner.
Like any other drug, there has to be some regulation, right ? I mean, there must be some oversight, right ? Med marijuana in Florida is a very new thing. I don’t like cronyism, but I understand the need to progress at a rate that won’t overwhelm the regulatory side .
The caps are due to the dangers of the medical treatment being dispensed. If the current law is unconstitutional, it can be re-written to achieve the desired purpose of protecting the public from the possibility that marIJuana will be illegally dispensed for recreational purposes through one or more of the dispensaries.
Lol, it is IMPOSSIBLE for medical dispensaries to sell marijuana illegally to random people without a prescription. Ridiculous! You must be the “conspiracy theorist” type. Maybe you misread the article? I don’t get it.
Impossible for marIJuana to be sold illegally to random people without a prescription?! Have you ever heard of accountants, bank tellers, cashiers embezzling money? Or, did you ever read about retail workers caught taking merchandise and selling it outside the store? Is that impossible, too? If you believe embezzlement and theft occurs, you too must be a conspiracy theorist. (sarcasm)
aren’t you the same guy who used to rant about BOTs and people funded by George Soros constantly switching their IP addresses to downvote conservatives in order to censor their views from the IJ?
if this is in fact true that you have evidence that people were using BOTs to numerously downvote conservative posts, I will humbly apologize.. Please post your correspondence between you and Mr. Simpson.
YOU need to contact Simpson, not me.
YOU’RE the one who said he corroborated your claim about BOTs funded by Soros, Yogi. The onus is on you to prove it.
“…violated the voter-approved…”
Pretty much all you need to see here. Floridian voters have spoken.
Actually, readers will see the words ‘medical’ in front of marIJuana and realize by logical deduction that the Florida voters did NOT approve recre-pot. Well, some Florida stoners will struggle with the ‘deduction’ part.
Disagree. Unlike you, most people read more than just the title of the article.
All I need to do is speculate that MEDI-POT dispensaries may sell medi-pot illegally, or its workers take some of the medi-pot illegally and sell it outside the dispensaries. Ever hear of ‘shrinkage’ in food stores or plant nurseries?
Yeah buddy, I am aware that employee pilferage occurs, but that has nothing to do with the comment we’re replying to where you said “readers will see the words ‘medical’ in front of marIJuana and realize…that the Florida voters did NOT approve recre-pot.”
Shrinkage may occur in medi-pot dispensaries, so THERE IS REASON for concern over illegal disbursement of medi-pot to recre-stoners. The rest of your post is diversion from this simple point.
Did I say your concern was invalid? No. Did I agree with your concern? Yup. Did I say you are failing to reply to the content of what this part of the thread is about (your argument that the title is misleading)? Yup. And you still are.
“When 71 percent of Floridians voted for access to this life-changing medicine, they didn’t expect restrictive legislation that stood in the way of progress and open markets.” Nikki Fried, Ag Commissioner.
Like any other drug, there has to be some regulation, right ? I mean, there must be some oversight, right ? Med marijuana in Florida is a very new thing. I don’t like cronyism, but I understand the need to progress at a rate that won’t overwhelm the regulatory side .