The question should be what took her so long to see the doctor again after the missed appointment. She missed the first appointment in March but didn’t attend the next meeting until June! She waited too long, she shouldn’t get the benifits while she wasted the time.
what a bogus ruling. can’t this be appealed? Why does the liability of the employee matter in a WC claim? I thought WC is a given to the employee regardless of liability. Someone care to enlighten me? Thanks.
Go figure…we are bogged down in syntax. But then if we all agreed on the definition of “is” upfront, we’d have no need for lawyers.
The question should be what took her so long to see the doctor again after the missed appointment. She missed the first appointment in March but didn’t attend the next meeting until June! She waited too long, she shouldn’t get the benifits while she wasted the time.
what a bogus ruling. can’t this be appealed? Why does the liability of the employee matter in a WC claim? I thought WC is a given to the employee regardless of liability. Someone care to enlighten me? Thanks.