Part of the problem here is the fines that are levied aren’t returned to the employees so they get screwed twice. Once by the business owner & again by the government agency
Part of the problem here is the fines levied don’t get passed back to the employee so they get screwed twice. Once by the business owner & again by the agency which levies & then keeps the fines. This isn’t fair.
Clearly this businessman was simply expressing his first amendment rights regarding the excessive and unnecessary regulations that were negatively impacting his business. Good on ya Mate!
Send that thieving, employee-cheating service station and car wash owner to prison.
Part of the problem here is the fines that are levied aren’t returned to the employees so they get screwed twice. Once by the business owner & again by the government agency
Part of the problem here is the fines levied don’t get passed back to the employee so they get screwed twice. Once by the business owner & again by the agency which levies & then keeps the fines. This isn’t fair.
Hey now, this fine gent sounds like he might be a good presidential economic advisor. Took one right out the playbook. I like it!
… Prosecutors also cite the intentional “wanton destruction” of evidence. …
Why bring Hillary into this story?
Clearly this businessman was simply expressing his first amendment rights regarding the excessive and unnecessary regulations that were negatively impacting his business. Good on ya Mate!