Judge Says in California, Starbucks Coffee Must Have Cancer Warning

By | April 2, 2018

  • April 2, 2018 at 2:59 pm
    mikey says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 21
    Thumb down 3

    I’m surprised no one has commented on this absurdity. CA slaps that cancer warning on just about EVERYTHING for sale in CA. A bunch of loons!

    • April 2, 2018 at 3:14 pm
      Counterpoint says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 12
      Thumb down 2

      I think it’s good for consumers to know what they are getting and what the risks are. You shouldn’t have to be a chemist to fully understand the risks associated with eating, drinking, or using common consumer products.

      That said, these labels are very overused. They don’t provide any context (how cancerous it is) nor do they detail what exactly is cancerous about it. It just leads to people almost ignoring them because it’s everywhere. Definitely needs to be re-worked in my opinion.

    • April 4, 2018 at 4:23 pm
      County Line says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 0

      Welcome to the Nanny State. At this pace, we should soon expect our state flag to change from the image of a fierce grizzly bear to perhaps a bawling toddler or a gavel-holding judge in a clown suit. There is law and there is order, and this once-great state has fallen sharply into hyper-legalism and dwindling sensible order.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *