Some people have built homes in very fire prone locations. If one purchases a home in one of these areas, he or she should pay for the risk associated with that decision.
While it is positive that some communities are focusing on loss prevention or loss reduction, the structures located in higher risk areas still maintain a much higher than average risk. It is not prudent or fair to force that risk on other people.
Many of these people are wealthy and do not need that subsidy that this bill proposes.
Some people have built homes in very fire prone locations. If one purchases a home in one of these areas, he or she should pay for the risk associated with that decision.
While it is positive that some communities are focusing on loss prevention or loss reduction, the structures located in higher risk areas still maintain a much higher than average risk. It is not prudent or fair to force that risk on other people.
Many of these people are wealthy and do not need that subsidy that this bill proposes.