Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Georgia Brokers and Agents Alarmed After Court Ruling Expands Liability for Them 
Storage Shed Caused Nashville Parking Garage Fire, Travelers Says in $10M Subro Suit 
Ben & Jerry’s Co-Founder Says Brand Being ‘Destroyed’ by Magnum 
USAA Not Done With Dividends: Florida Reforms Prompt $500M Payout From This Issue
