Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Cleared of Charges, NJ’s Norcross Sues Inquirer, Editor for $100M in Defamation Suit
Cyber Threats the Top Business Concern as AI Heightens Risk: Travelers Risk Index
Independent Agencies Total About 37,000 in 2026, a Decrease From 2024
Musk’s Boring Co. Working on Tunnel to Link Austin and San Antonio 


