Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Kroger Plans to Slash 37% of Corporate Jobs in Next Three Years
Europe’s Insurers Cut Coverage of Weather Losses, Report Says
Friend of Suspected FBI Data Thief: ‘Crazy’ Teen Warned Not to Hack Bureau
Industry Reacts to Senators’ Letter for Claims Data and Recent Reports 


