Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
D&O Market Expected to Tighten Under Pressure, Says AM Best
USAA Not Done With Dividends: Florida Reforms Prompt $500M Payout
Miami Moves to Seize Part of Posh Island After Fuel Fight
Karen Read Sues Police Agencies That Investigated Her Boyfriend’s Death 


