Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Kyle Busch and Wife Settle Lawsuit With Pacific Life and Insurance Agent 
Florida House Gives Final Approval to Much-Debated Citizens Clearinghouse Bill 
Prices for New Cars Have Soared. Here’s One Big Reason Why 
Fund Trying to Turn New Mexico Desert into an Advanced Tech Hub From This Issue
