Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Erie CEO NeCastro Steps Down Early; Bolash Named Interim Leader
GM to Pay $220M to Settle Privacy Claims Over Sale of Driver Data to Insurers
Georgia, Florida Insurers Facing New Scrutiny, Regulations After Election
Some Trends Signal Potential Hope for US Commercial Auto: AM Best 


