Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
KPMG Australia to Fire Hundreds of Workers as Crisis Deepens
Buc-ee’s Faces Backlash in Ohio Over Logo Lawsuit With Mini Mart
Florida Grand Jury Finds DeSantis Admin Misused $10M; Yaworsky Signed Off on it
Ex-Meta Staffer Says 99% of Teens Shunned Early Safety Tool 


