Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Florida Appeals Court Reverses $200M Jury Verdict in Maya Kowalski Case 
PHLY Makes Largest Acquisition in Its History With Collector Car Business Expansion 
Don’t Look Now, But Citizens Is No Longer the Largest Property Insurer in Florida 
Marsh Sues More Former Employees Over ‘Scheme’ to Open Howden US From This Issue
