Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
New York Restaurateur Charged In No-Fault Auto Insurance Fraud Scheme 
Agency Customer Rep and Miami Businessman Killed in Separate Boat Accidents 
More Insurance M&A Deals on the Horizon? 
Depreciation on ACV Is OK, Court Says in Knocking Down Class Action vs. Cincinnati From This Issue
