Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Florida’s Unemployment Rate Is Surging Even as High-Profile Companies Move In 
US House Passes Bill to Extend Federal Terrorism Backstop Through 2034 
Flood Insurance Gap Will Squeeze Local Governments and Homeowners, Moody’s Says 
Endless Shrimp Deal Was Scheme to Squeeze Red Lobster, Suit Says From This Issue
