The Michigan Supreme Court’s 4-3 decision to preclude trial courts from bundling together asbestos cases for trial or settlement is an “excellent first step toward restoring balanced justice” in asbestos cases in the state, according to insurance companies.
“From now on, each case will be tried or settled on its own merits, rather than bundling a large number of people who are not sick with one or two truly sick people,” said Dave Golden, director of commercial lines for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “This also means that people sick from asbestos will get the individual attention they deserve. We may see faster resolution of those cases where the facts and injuries are clear.”
Plaintiff lawyers, however, predicted chaos and delay in Michigan courts.
“This costs the state more money, it costs the defendants more money and it costs the plaintiffs more money,” James Bedortha, an attorney for asbestos patients, told The Associated Press.
About 2,500 asbestos cases are pending in Michigan, while Ohio has more than 40,000.
Meanwhile, Michigan lawmakers are working on legislation that would prioritize claimants based on medical criteria. The U.S. Congress also has been considering federal legislation on asbestos.
Topics Legislation Michigan
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Chubb Wins Latest Battle With New York Diocese in Bid to Avoid Sex Abuse Claims 
AIG General Insurance Chairman McElroy to Retire May 1 
Trump’s Bond Insurer Tells Judge Shortfall Is ‘Inconceivable’ 
UnitedHealth Says Hackers Possibly Stole Large Number of Americans’ Data From This Issue
