The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that roving checks for drivers under the influence of alcohol are legal.
The ruling upheld the 2003 conviction of Greg Beaman, of Pittsburgh, who was stopped by Pittsburgh police in 2001. He appealed his conviction, claiming that the roving stops, which are a variant on DUI checkpoints, amounted to an unreasonable search.
The Supreme Court agreed with a Superior Court ruling that upheld the roving stops. The lower court found such stops were not unreasonable.
The roving stops rely in part on an officer’s suspicion that a driver is under the influence. In checkpoints, all drivers on a chosen roadway are given at least a cursory observation by trained officers.
Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Roger Poe says: 
Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case
