East News

Two Fox News Employees Sue, Claiming Toxic Mold in TV Studio

Two Fox News employees have filed a lawsuit claiming they were sickened by air contaminated with toxic molds and pesticides while working in the building where "The O'Reilly Factor'' and "At Large with Geraldo Rivera'' are produced.

Laurette DeRosairo and Madronicia Clarke, both Fox employees for about nine years, say in court papers that the molds and the "inappropriate'' use of cleaning agents and pesticides has caused them headaches, dizziness, weakness, anxiety and blurred vision.

DeRosairo, a control booth graphics technician, and Clarke, a makeup artist, said they were made ill while working within the broadcasting complex that produces shows that also include "Hannity and Colmes'' and "Dayside.''

The chemicals caused DeRosairo to develop acute asthma, a sensitivity to scents that causes her throat to constrict, and other respiratory problems, the suit said. It claimed that Clark suffers chronic fatigue, autoimmune diseases and other health problems.

Kenneth F. McCallion, the women's lawyer, said DeRosairo was taken to a hospital in March 2005 with respiratory distress after she was exposed to a pesticide in the studio.

The lawsuit, filed Jan. 27 in Manhattan's state Supreme Court, names Fox news and the building's management company as defendants. It asks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages for their alleged injuries.

Irena Briganti, spokeswoman for Fox News, issued a statement saying, "The allegations in this lawsuit are baseless and lack merit.''

She said the federal Occupational, Safety and Health Administration had declined to investigate, and an onsite probe by the state's Department of Environmental Conservation had left the matter "fully resolved.''

"Fox news is in full compliance with both OSHA and DEC guidelines,'' Briganti said.

Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Sponsored by National Risk Solutions

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: mold & lawsuits Anti Pinko
Feb 8, 2006, 7:45 am
RE: mold & lawsuits Paul Gordon
Feb 7, 2006, 8:25 pm
toxic mold Helena
Feb 7, 2006, 6:42 am
RE: To: Fair & Balanced NoProofRadio
Feb 3, 2006, 1:22 pm
To: Fair & Balanced banana
Feb 3, 2006, 1:00 pm
mold & lawsuits fair & balanced
Feb 2, 2006, 1:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: resp NoProofRadio
Feb 2, 2006, 11:15 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respirat Stat guy
Feb 2, 2006, 10:45 am
to NoProofRadio stat guy
Feb 2, 2006, 10:40 am
RE: RE: baseless and lacks merit stat guy
Feb 2, 2006, 9:10 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NoProofRadio
Feb 1, 2006, 3:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: D
Feb 1, 2006, 3:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: resp NoProofRadio
Feb 1, 2006, 3:27 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respirat Pro Life
Feb 1, 2006, 3:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory NoProofRadio
Feb 1, 2006, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory inju H
Feb 1, 2006, 2:58 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury NoProofRadio
Feb 1, 2006, 2:32 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury D
Feb 1, 2006, 2:12 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury NoProofRadio
Feb 1, 2006, 2:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury d
Feb 1, 2006, 1:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury NoProofRadio
Feb 1, 2006, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury D
Feb 1, 2006, 1:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury NoProofRadio
Feb 1, 2006, 7:57 am
Nothing lacks merit when you are exposed...... Sharon Cross
Jan 31, 2006, 8:57 pm
RE: RE: respiratory Funkie
Jan 31, 2006, 3:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: respiratory injury sean and alan
Jan 31, 2006, 3:38 pm
Sick at Fox ExAdjuster
Jan 31, 2006, 3:18 pm
RE: RE: respiratory injury The Real Danny P
Jan 31, 2006, 3:18 pm
RE: Baseless and lacks merit Jimmy C
Jan 31, 2006, 3:16 pm
RE: RE: respiratory injury Sean
Jan 31, 2006, 3:10 pm
RE: RE: respiratory injury Sean
Jan 31, 2006, 3:08 pm
back to baseless and lacks merit Ned
Jan 31, 2006, 2:57 pm
RE: respiratory injury Danny P
Jan 31, 2006, 2:34 pm
respiratory injury Ned
Jan 31, 2006, 1:36 pm
RE: respiratory "injury" DirtDevil
Jan 31, 2006, 1:24 pm
RE: baseless and lacks merit TV News
Jan 31, 2006, 1:24 pm
baseless and lacks merit Ned
Jan 31, 2006, 11:37 am
"baseless and lacks merit" Danny P
Jan 31, 2006, 8:26 am