Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Schinnerer Introduces Stand-Alone Workers' Comp
- Atlantic Coast Can Expect 3 to 6 Major Hurricanes This Season: NOAA
- California Offers Glimpse Into Health Insurance Prices Under Obamacare
- Top 10 U.S. Insurers in Tornado-Stricken States: SNL Financial
- 76 Tornadoes in May Caused $2B-$5B in Insured Losses: Eqecat
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- Top 10 U.S. Insurers in Tornado-Stricken States: SNL Financial
- Atlantic Coast Can Expect 3 to 6 Major Hurricanes This Season: NOAA
- Brown & Brown to Acquire Insurance Broker Beecher Carlson
- GOP Questions Fundraising for ObamacareMay 21, 2013 | Comments (174)
- Employer Contraception Mandate Headed to Court for Ban RulingMay 22, 2013 | Comments (92)
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. EmployersMay 21, 2013 | Comments (24)
- Atlantic Coast Can Expect 3 to 6 Major Hurricanes This Season: NOAAMay 23, 2013 | Comments (6)
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public RealizesMay 20, 2013 | Comments (6)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
The Maryland Insurance Administration supported the measure, in part because the agency was receiving complaints about anti-concurrent causation clauses being used more often and in a more expansive manner.
More QuotesMaryland Insurance Administration spokesperson Vivian Laxton

Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing Companies



What a Patriot! Thank YOU Sherry!
Citigroup pays zero net! Why? Because taxpayers bailed out Citi and continues to bail them out with near zero interest rates, mark to fantasy accounting & special Fed programs that Citi and the rest of the banks that own our government utilize every day. Of course no one ever goes to jail for this fraud because both political parties rely on these banks for campaign contributions. This payment is just a cost of doing business for Citi which they pass on to their customers via higher fees or near zero returns on savings.
DC needs an enema…..FIRE THEM ALL
…totaling more than $4.8 billion in underlying principal obligations. Of those loans, 9,636 (or more than 30% percent) have defaulted. Citi’s default rate soared to more than 47% for loans originated in 2006 and 2007. In other words, nearly every other loan Citi endorsed for FHA insurance in the critical years leading up to the financial crisis defaulted, resulting in foreclosures and evictions and ultimately depressed real estate values, all to the detriment of the national housing market and the national economy. Moreover, of the loans Citi originated in 2007, over 10.5% went into early payment default. HUD has already paid nearly $200 million in insurance claims on loans that Citi originated or underwrote since 2004. A substantial percentage of those claims resulted from loans that were ineligible for FHA insurance and never should have been insured. Thousands of other loans are currently in default, which the Government expects to result in additional insurance claims paid by HUD in the future.
7. While Citi made substantial profits through the sale and/or securitization of FHAinsured mortgages, it wrongfully endorsed mortgages that were not eligible for FHA insurance under HUD rules. Notwithstanding the mortgages’ ineligibility, Citi endorsed the mortgages for FHA insurance by falsely certifying that they complied with HUD requirements and that its underwriters had conducted any necessary due diligence required by HUD rules.
Read the court docs here:
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s71/sh/e8abbe44-ad5e-4aab-a588-25270c4a522b/82531a482723f07699e8c80c71fe1260