FTC Finds Use of Credit Helps Consumers, Insurer Group Says

July 20, 2007

The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) study of automobile insurers’ use of credit has reaffirmed the strong connection between credit information and the risk of loss and has determined that its use helps to increase the availability and affordability of insurance for most consumers, according to the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI).

“Now there should be no doubt about the value of using this highly predictive underwriting and rating tool,” said June Holmes, interim CEO for PCI. “Using credit information makes underwriting and pricing more accurate and results in many consumers paying less for their automobile and homeowners insurance policies. Consumers want to pay a fair price for insurance that matches their risk of loss. To achieve the goal of pricing based on an individual’s risk of loss; insurers simply want to use the most accurate, statistically valid tools available and credit information has proven to be one of the best predictors of loss. With these findings, legislators and regulators should be very comfortable with insurers’ use of insurance scoring.”

The FTC study was designed to explore the effect that credit information has on the availability and affordability of insurance. The study considered the statistical relationship between credit information and the risk of loss. It also examined the extent to which, if any, the use of credit scoring models, credit scores, and credit-based insurance scores affect the availability and affordability of insurance by racial and ethnic minority groups and low-income groups.

The report’s major conclusions are as follows:

•Insurance scores are effective predictors of risk under automobile policies. They are predictive of the number of claims consumers file and the total cost of those claims. The use of scores is therefore likely to make the price of insurance better match the risk of loss posed by the consumer. Thus, on average, higher-risk consumers will pay higher premiums and lower-risk consumers will pay lower premiums.

•Use of credit-based insurance scores may result in benefits for consumers. For example, scores permit insurance companies to evaluate risk with greater accuracy, which may make them more willing to offer insurance to higher-risk consumers for whom they would otherwise not be able to determine an appropriate premium. Scores also may make the process of granting and pricing insurance quicker and cheaper, cost savings that may be passed on to consumers in the form of lower premiums.

•Credit-based insurance scores appear to have little effect as a “proxy” for membership in racial and ethnic groups in decisions related to insurance. The relationship between scores and claims risk remains strong when controls for race, ethnicity, and neighborhood income are included in statistical models of risk.

“The FTC study demonstrates that by looking at an insurance score there is no way to determine a person’s race, ethnicity, or economic status,” said Holmes. “However, a specific high or low score will offer strong evidence as to the likelihood of that person filing an insurance claim. Being able to make this distinction regarding risk of loss allows insurers to charge each individual an appropriate rate. The bottom line is that insurers underwrite individuals, not ethnic or income groups, and the use of credit information results in each individual’s premium more accurately their risk of loss.”

Insurance scoring has proven to be a highly accurate and objective factor. Previous studies have found that the average loss per vehicle for people with the worst scores are double that of people with the best scores and drivers with the best scores are involved in 40 percent fewer accidents than those with the worst scores. Additionally, homeowners insurance claims history for people with the worst scores are triple that of people with the best scores. Earlier studies have also demonstrated that insurance scores are among the three most important rating variables used by insurers. In fact, insurance scores were found to be a better predictor of claims than driving records.

In the 1990s the use of credit information started to become very common among insurers. During the past decade, most states have enacted laws or adopted regulations to govern insurers’ use of credit information. In nearly half the states the insurance industry along with legislators and regulators have agreed that it is important to provide certain allowances for consumers facing extraordinary life circumstances such as divorce, death of a spouse, medical catastrophe, temporary loss of employment or identity theft, all of which can damage an individual’s credit history. Insurers recognize these events may be beyond the control of an individual and will exempt credit from being a consideration in the underwriting and rating process. Insurers will also reconsider a score when there is an error found on a credit report. These important safeguards allow consumers some leeway in the event they encounter difficult circumstances while at the same time it offers benefits to most consumers.

“Experience has shown that fiscally responsible consumers with good credit histories have fewer losses than individuals with poor financial track records,” said Holmes. “Because these individuals represent a lower risk to insurance companies, they pay a lower rate for their coverage. By using credit information along with a variety of other factors — including years of driving experience, previous crashes, and the age of the vehicle — insurers can more accurately gauge the risk characteristics of each consumer and charge a premium that accurately reflects the amount of risk presented by each individual policyholder. Each underwriting factor is applied to each individual in exactly the same way, ensuring that the process is objective and colorblind. Based on real world experience and backed up by studies such as the FTC’s, insurers have found that the use of credit information is one of the most accurate ways to differentiate between lower and higher insurance risks.”

Source: Property Casualty Insurers Association of America

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • July 30, 2007 at 2:04 am
    jc says:
    HEADLINE:FTC Commissioner Disowns Agency's Credit-Based Insurance Scoring Study SUMMARY A member of the Federal Trade Commission says she distrusts the agency's own study on t... read more
  • July 26, 2007 at 3:33 am
    Nobody Important says:
    I have a frustration in general with the posters on this site who don't understand insurance and won't take the time to learn anything about it. At the same time they feel qu... read more
  • July 26, 2007 at 3:15 am
    JC says:
    Nobody important -- no one said you had limited intelligence or were ignorant.
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features