National News

Judge Rules Transsexual Discrimination Protected Under Federal Law

A federal judge has awarded a former Army Special Forces commander nearly $500,000 because she was rejected from a job at the Library of Congress while transitioning from a man to a woman.

Diane Schroer of Alexandria, Va., applied for the terrorism analyst job while she was still a man named David Schroer. He was offered the job, but the offer was pulled after he told a library official that he was having surgery to change his gender.

U.S. District Judge James Robinson ruled Tuesday that Schroer was entitled to $491,190 in back pay and damages because of sex discrimination.

The Library of Congress and the Justice Department argued unsuccessfully that discrimination because of transsexuality was not illegal sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act.

The American Civil Liberties Union had argued the case on Schroer's behalf. Paul Cates with the ACLU's Lesbian and Gay Rights Project said the ruling was significant because a federal judge said that discriminating against someone for changing genders is sex discrimination under federal law.

Schroer is a former U.S. Army colonel who directed a classified group that tracked and targeted terrorists. Schroer retired in 2004 and worked briefly in the private sector before applying for the Congressional Research Service job at the Library of Congress.

After being offered the job, Schroer had lunch with a Library of Congress official and explained the upcoming surgery. Schroer testified the official called the next day and said the position would not be a "good fit.''

Copyright 2010 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: Done ask and don't tell... GA
May 4, 2009, 10:11 am
RE: Done ask and don't tell... anon the mouse
May 3, 2009, 8:47 pm
RE: It's Not Just About Mary B.
May 1, 2009, 5:44 pm
Discussion Over Dread
May 1, 2009, 2:02 pm
RE: RE: Sex Discrimination? Scott
May 1, 2009, 12:09 pm
"Kumbaya" MoonChild
May 1, 2009, 9:43 am
RE: Response to David - Back at you, Frank David
May 1, 2009, 9:15 am
RE: RE: Sex Discrimination? Annette
May 1, 2009, 8:51 am
RE: Sex Discrimination? Are you serious
May 1, 2009, 8:24 am
RE: RE: Marrissa, the problem is you Richard
May 1, 2009, 8:12 am
Response to David Frank
May 1, 2009, 8:07 am
RE: RE: RE: the government was just doing good underwriting Are you serious
May 1, 2009, 8:07 am
RE: Marrissa, the problem is you Mark Smith
May 1, 2009, 8:00 am
RE: Sex Discrimination? Danielle
May 1, 2009, 7:54 am
I give ex special forces guys a wide latitude Smitty
Apr 30, 2009, 6:26 pm
RE: Anything goes HanValen
Apr 30, 2009, 5:46 pm
Anything goes Flower Child
Apr 30, 2009, 4:02 pm
Scott has it all figured out. Wow
Apr 30, 2009, 3:52 pm
Marrissa, the problem is you David
Apr 30, 2009, 3:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: It's Not Just About mm
Apr 30, 2009, 3:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: It's Not Just About Marissa
Apr 30, 2009, 3:19 pm
RE: RE: Sex Discrimination? GA
Apr 30, 2009, 2:56 pm
RE: RE: Sex Discrimination? GA
Apr 30, 2009, 2:56 pm
RE: Sex Discrimination? Ghost Buster
Apr 30, 2009, 2:53 pm
Sex Discrimination? Scott
Apr 30, 2009, 2:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: It's Not Just About GA
Apr 30, 2009, 2:39 pm
Just cause KOB
Apr 30, 2009, 2:29 pm
RE: RE: the government was just doing good underwriting Al
Apr 30, 2009, 2:24 pm
RE: RE: It's Not Just About Marissa
Apr 30, 2009, 2:23 pm
RE: It's Not Just About GA
Apr 30, 2009, 2:16 pm
It's Not Just About "Shim" Marissa
Apr 30, 2009, 2:03 pm
RE: the government was just doing good underwriting GA
Apr 30, 2009, 1:57 pm
the government was just doing good underwriting Nugget
Apr 30, 2009, 12:58 pm