Study: Private Insurers Can Complement National Flood Insurance

By Young Ha | December 20, 2011

There is a new study out that examines the U.S. flood insurance program. And it says that according to its calculations, there are some regions in the country where National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) premiums are too high.

The report is from the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. It says these high premiums in some areas present opportunities for private insurers to provide coverage and complement the NFIP.

NFIP Covers Over 5M Households

In the U.S., residential flood insurance is provided mainly by the NFIP, which was established in 1968. It has been covering more than five million households ($1.25 trillion of property) across the country and has been renewed more than a dozen times over the past three years, including after first being allowed to lapse.

Aerial view of flooding in Minot, North Dakota, in July 2011. Photo Credit: FEMA

The report says the NFIP has brought important benefits to those living in hazard-prone areas over the years. For example, in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike in 2008, it provided insured flood victims with $2.6 billion in claim payments. Hurricane Katrina triggered nearly $18 billion in claims payments, 99 percent of which were settled in less than one year.

But the program also faces important challenges: For example, it is now $17.8 billion in debt due to historical levels of flood claims following the 2005 and 2008 hurricane seasons. Also, many residents in flood-prone areas are not insured and many maps used to determine flood zones are outdated.

There is a growing consensus that the NFIP needs reforms. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which is responsible for the NFIP, has recently proposed several reform options, including privatization of flood insurance.

Many Believe Private Insurance Will Always Be More Costly

Many believe that private flood insurance will always be more costly than what the NFIP currently charges. But the Wharton study says that may not be the case.

The Wharton study, with probabilistic catastrophe flood modeling conducted by CoreLogic, analyzed the likelihood of future catastrophic flooding — and the potential cost of providing private flood insurance — in a pilot study focusing on two flood-prone counties in Texas.

The analysis calculated the “actuarially fair” flood insurance premium, based on the probabilistic risk models, for more than 300,000 residences in Galveston and Travis Counties. The Wharton study then compared these rates to the rates currently charged by the NFIP.

Study Sees Opportunities for Private Insurers

Based on those estimates, the report shows in the regions analyzed that there are certain areas where NFIP premiums, are, on average, too high (and other areas where premiums on average are too low).

“This presents opportunities for private insurers to provide coverage in some of those areas, to complement the NFIP,” said Erwann Michel-Kerjan, Risk Center managing director and study co-author.

“There are several practical barriers that would need to be addressed for private insurers to sell such coverage, but if done, this could significantly increase the number of residents with proper coverage, thus reducing the need for government disaster relief.”

The full report can be found at: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/WhartonRiskCenter_TexasFloodInsurancePricingStudy.pdf

 

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • December 21, 2011 at 6:53 pm
    George Campbell says:
    Lets not forget that the private industry couldn't handle insuring against floods in the past. This is exactly why the NFIP was created in the first place.
  • December 21, 2011 at 2:18 pm
    jw says:
    NFIP is the public option just like state funds for workmens comp and medicare. No way private ins cos will replace. Spread of risk is still the guiding principle of insurance... read more
  • December 21, 2011 at 2:03 pm
    Anejo says:
    Am I missing something? Wouldn't skimming off the over priced/ profitable business into the private market put NFIP in an even worse financial position? I'm all for free marke... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features