Trump Labor Chief Nominee Puzder Dodges Disability Bias Suit for Now

By | February 13, 2017

Labor secretary nominee Andrew Puzder, the controversial business leader expected to undergo a U.S. Senate confirmation hearing next week, will be spared an emotionally weighted and concurrent discrimination trial against the restaurant group he heads.

A state court in Orange County, California, has granted CKE Restaurants Inc a delay from Feb. 27 – when the full Senate might still be considering Puzder’s nomination – to early June for an age and disability discrimination lawsuit after the company cited “negative publicity” generated by his nomination.

Puzder, CKE Restaurants’ chief executive, has been under fire by Democrats and labor groups for opposing increases in the minimum wage and aiming to curb worker protections. But his expected confirmation by a Republican majority in the Senate has not been knocked off track.

By the June 5 trial, he may be labor secretary and well along the way to divesting himself from the company. Puzder agreed to divest his stakes in CKE, worth anywhere between $11 million and $55 million, if confirmed, according to an ethics submission reviewed by Reuters.

Puzder’s confirmation hearing has been repeatedly delayed as a government ethics office reviewed his plan to divest from CKE, which owns franchised restaurants, including Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s.

Puzder also promised to divest his holdings in more than 200 assets, including Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Altria Group Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Cisco Systems Inc., within 90 days of his confirmation. He will divest from more illiquid funds within 180 days, but he declined to provide details for some of the funds’ underlying assets, citing a confidentiality agreement.

The California case was brought by James Dombrowski, whose employment was terminated as he recovered from a brain biopsy, according to court filings.

CKE’s franchised restaurants have faced wage-and-hour and labor condition complaints from workers, but the Dombrowski case is against the holding company largely controlled by Puzder.

CKE was also named in an antitrust lawsuit filed by current and former Carl’s Jr. workers in a California court on Wednesday that alleges a scheme to suppress wages across its franchises by using “no hire” agreements.

Dombrowski claims that he was fired by CKE when he tried to return to work in 2015, at the age of 68, after taking a disability leave following a brain biopsy which temporarily paralyzed him.

CKE’s attorney in the Dombrowski case, Scott Ferrell, argued that the negative publicity surrounding CKE’s business practices due to Puzder’s fame as a Cabinet nominee would hurt the company’s ability to have a fair jury trial, not that the case would in any way hurt Puzder’s ability to be confirmed.

Ferrell declined to comment on the case. Dombrowski’s attorney did not respond to requests for comment. A representative of Puzder also declined to comment.

CKE Restaurants has said it is up to its franchises to set wages and working conditions and they are protected from liability as a franchisor.

Puzder, an enthusiastic early supporter of President Donald Trump, has lobbied against efforts to raise the minimum wage and is expected to roll back rules aimed at curbing unpaid overtime and improving worker safety if confirmed to head the Labor Department.

(Reporting By Amanda Becker, with additional reporting by Sarah Lynch and Robert Iafolla; editing by Linda Stern and Jonathan Oatis)

Get Insurance Journal Every Day

Latest Comments

  • February 17, 2017 at 4:16 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Actually, they were in international waters, which is legal. The subs have been there on many prior occasions. All large nations do such 'spying'. However, the fake news media... read more
  • February 17, 2017 at 4:12 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Actually, Libitteral; I know EXACTLY what he did was part of his job. Believe what you wish, if it gives you solace over the next 4 years.
  • February 17, 2017 at 4:10 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    You're sore about that two week ban, right? Never mind; don't answer. It was a rhetorical question.
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features