Texas / South Central News

Texas Jury Awards $24.7 Million in Drunk Driving Case

A Harris County, Texas jury awarded $24.7 million to the family of a woman who died in a crash with a drunken driver four years ago, the Associated Press reported.

Advertisement
Insurance Journal's Agency Salary Survey

The civil jury found Jeffrey Lamont Tate responsible for $14.82 million and his insurance company and a rental car agency responsible for $4.94 million each.

The award is subject to the approval of state District Judge Randy Wilson, who heard the weeklong trial.

Richard Mithoff, who represented 56-year-old victim Helen Nettles' family, said Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co. arranged for Tate to get a rental vehicle from Enterprise Leasing Co. in November 2000 even though a month earlier Tate had been cited for driving while intoxicated and his license had been suspended.

A day after renting the car, Mithoff said Tate "was intoxicated and in a high-speed crash struck'' Nettles' pickup truck, causing it to slam into a light pole and burst into flames. Nettles died in the fire, he said.

"The jury found the insurance company was accountable for its own negligence in arranging for a rental when it knew its policyholder could not legally drive because of a suspended license,'' Mithoff said. "Even though they knew Tate had a prior DWI and suspended license, they made arrangements for a rental car with their in-house agency, Enterprise.''

Enterprise Rent-A-Car spokeswoman Christy Conrad said Tate presented the rental company with a valid driver's license. She said the company previously settled with the Nettles family and that confidential settlement would stand despite the jury's recommendation.

"This is a terrible tragedy and we are very sorry it happened,'' Conrad said. "Our hearts go out to the Nettles family.''

Tate's attorney, John Causey, said his client is happy to get the case behind him. Tate is serving a 13-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to vehicular manslaughter.

"He is relieved that the Nettles can get on, hopefully as well as possible, with their life,'' Causey said. "He was seriously concerned about the Nettles family.''

Causey said the proceeds of a $20,000 insurance policy Tate had were turned over to the Nettleses shortly after the crash.

"Of course he has no assets at all,'' Causey said. "The only thing he had was the insurance policy.''

Causey said Tate's car had been damaged in the one-car accident that led to his October arrest and he needed a car to get to work. Causey said his insurance policy provided for a rental car and he contacted Progressive, who forwarded his call to Enterprise.

"Basically they transferred a phone call and that was the extent of their involvement,'' Causey said of Progressive.

He said Tate didn't realize his license had been suspended because the notice was sent to an old address and authorities returned the license to him following his initial arrest.

Progressive attorney Kevin Hood declined to comment on the jury's verdict.

Mithoff said Nettles' family also settled with Toyota, which manufactured the pickup truck, prior to the trial.

The family hopes the verdict will "serve notice to insurance companies and rental car companies not to arrange for leasing of vehicles to policyholders with known DWI convictions or a suspended license,'' Mithoff said.

Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
eerie coincidence Rhiannon
Jan 27, 2008, 5:24 am
Helen Nettles was a great person R. K. Hester
Dec 6, 2007, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: DWI case Dawn Bailey
Oct 19, 2005, 10:26 am
outrage Jack G
Aug 19, 2004, 11:58 am
RE: RE: DWI case Jack
Aug 19, 2004, 7:12 am
RE: Award barbara steele
Aug 18, 2004, 5:12 pm
Award Mark
Aug 18, 2004, 5:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: DWI case Mark
Aug 18, 2004, 5:01 pm
RE: Marks Comment Mark
Aug 18, 2004, 4:48 pm
RE: Re: Ridiculous DOUG WHITEHURST
Aug 17, 2004, 3:30 pm
Re: Ridiculous Gayle Drummond
Aug 17, 2004, 2:34 pm
ridiculously high award barbara steele
Aug 16, 2004, 6:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: DWI case Jack
Aug 16, 2004, 5:44 pm
Adjuster's liability KOB
Aug 16, 2004, 5:15 pm
ridiculous award KOB
Aug 16, 2004, 5:08 pm
RE: Brett's Comment Martin
Aug 16, 2004, 3:28 pm
RE: Brett's Comment Martin
Aug 16, 2004, 3:28 pm
RE: Brett's Comment Martin
Aug 16, 2004, 3:28 pm
RE: DWI case BARBARA STEELE
Aug 16, 2004, 2:12 pm
Marks Comment BOYD
Aug 16, 2004, 9:36 am
Juries Dody
Aug 13, 2004, 5:42 pm
RE: DWI case Rod
Aug 13, 2004, 5:28 pm
RE: RE: DWI case Mark
Aug 13, 2004, 4:50 pm
RE: DWI case Dan Fagan
Aug 13, 2004, 4:26 pm
DWI case Brett Calder
Aug 13, 2004, 3:23 pm
RE: RE: DWI case Jon
Aug 13, 2004, 3:18 pm
RE: DWI case David
Aug 13, 2004, 3:01 pm
RE: DWI case ANDY
Aug 13, 2004, 2:38 pm
RE: DWI case Jack
Aug 13, 2004, 2:21 pm
DWI case Steve R
Aug 13, 2004, 1:59 pm