“Certificates of Insurance: The Second Most Dangerous Piece of Paper,” including specifics about various insurance contract terms and provisions, and what to do and not to do with certificates of insurance were discussed by Bill Perkins, an instructor for the Florida Association of Insurance Agents.
Perkins spoke during a continuing education course sponsored by the Florida SunCoast Chapter of Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriters in Tampa, Fla. CPCU invited insurance industry members, contractors, bankers and government officials to the educational event which drew a record turnout.
Key points touched on by Perkins were:
• A certificate only reflects coverage found in the policy. A certificate can not change a policy. A modification to the certificate, even with company approval, is meaningless unless an endorsement is issued by the carrier to reflect the detail found in the certificate.
• A certificate is for informational purposes only and confers no rights to the certificate holder.
• Caution is necessary when using a non-ACORD form. If using a proprietary certificate or one that is modeled on ACORD but modified by the certificate holder for use by the agent, careful attention should be used to determine if unique provisions have been added or if limitations have been removed.
• Agents and their staff must be properly trained on how to complete ACORD forms by using the instructions provided by ACORD with each of its forms.
• Clients must be informed of contractual requirements that may be counter to insurance provisions. Careful reading of insurance provisions and consultation with the agent before the contract is signed is recommended as best practice.
Perkins said FAIA has crafted language for the spring session of the Florida Legislature designed to provide some statutory basis for restricting the practice of some certificate holders who after receipt of a certificate of insurance, permit work to be done or materials delivered and then refuse payment for these services after it is determined by the certificate holder that the original certificate is unacceptable.
“If a certificate of insurance is issued to a subcontractor and he gives it to someone else who accepts it and does not question its compliance, then ACORDing to FAIA’s proposal the work or material delivered would be the financial obligation of the contractor or third party,” Perkins explained.
Perkins said there are protections build into the legislation for certificate holders in cases involving noncompliance, fraud, as well as providing a three-day review period.
FAIA’s provision, according to Perkins, would clearly establish who has liability if a certificate of insurance is given to a contractor or sub-contractor.
Perkins explained that if a client fails to meet these requirements he will be prohibited from working until he is in compliance.
“If you give the certificate of liability insurance to someone and if they look at it and say you are not in compliance, you can not work on the job,” he said. “That is a reasonable action to take.”
Perkins described instances in which the client performs work and in the 11th hour the certificate holder scrutinizes the document and learns the certificate is not in compliance.
“Because it is not in compliance, they are going to withhold payment under the contract and their requirement might be things like, an additional insureds endorsement under workers’ compensation, which is not available,” Perkins explained. “An agent will be unable to provide contractual requirements, but the contractor is still contractually responsible, the agent comes back and says we have done everything we can do to help you, but we can not provide this.
“That does not mean that because it can not be provided by the agent that you as a client aren’t still bound by those provisions, and that’s why you have to go back and read the contract” he said.
Perkins said the worst-case scenario is when an agent amends the certificate of insurance without the corresponding changes to the policy.
Topics Florida Agencies Contractors
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Viewpoint: The 10 Major Risks Shaping Insurance Today 
Liberty Mutual Posts $1.5B Net Income for Q1, Reversing Loss 
Michigan Supreme Court Rules Against Couple in Drone Surveillance Case 
Three Insurers Reject Chevron’s $57 Million Claim for Iran Oil Seizure 
