West News

State Farm Faces Class Action Lawsuit

A class action lawsuit was filed in U.S. Federal Court, Central District, alleging that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is enriching itself with payments rightfully belonging to its insureds in violation of California law, particularly the "Make Whole Rule."

Advertisement

When State Farm policyholder Stuart Chandler of Fresno, Calif., was rear-ended, his personal automobile insurance policy entitled him to a rental car while his car was being fixed. Under Chandler's auto policy, State Farm paid 80 percent of the $317.45. Chandler was charged for his rental car, leaving Chandler to pay 20 percent, or $63.49, in out-of-pocket expenses.

According to the plaintiff's lawyer, State Farm then went to the other party's insurance company to collect the money it had paid out to Chandler. That insurance company reimbursed State Farm $70 for the rental car. The complaint alleges that pursuant to California's "Make Whole Rule," State Farm should have refunded Chandler from that amount the $63.49 for out-of-pocket expenses he incurred before it could retain any of those funds for itself. Instead, the complaint alleges, State Farm kept the full amount for itself, ignoring the fact that Chandler has not been fully compensated for his loss as required by law.

"California common law provides that when a policyholder suffers a loss from a car accident, the policyholder must be reimbursed for all of his losses before State Farm has a right to reimbursement for any money it paid out under its policy," said Long Beach, Calif., plaintiff attorney Stephen M. Garcia of The Garcia Law Firm.

This rule is known as the "Make Whole Rule," and is a common law exception to an insurance company's subrogation right. The "Make Whole Rule" basically states that before any of the recovery is allocated to the insurer, the insured who suffered the loss must be fully compensated for all the elements of damages, not just those for which the insurer has indemnified the policy holder.

According to State Farm's Web site, the company insures more cars any other insurer in the United States and handled 12.3 million total claims in 2007.

"Mr. Chandler's case is just $63 and change," Garcia said. "Imagine $63 times the tens of thousands of claims State Farm handles in California alone. We believe that State Farm is enriching itself with money that rightfully belongs to its policyholders."

Source: The Garcia Law Firm

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Shame on IJ for printing this!!! Ivy
May 22, 2008, 5:39 pm
Only in Calif UDT
May 21, 2008, 1:44 pm
RE: EF
May 18, 2008, 11:43 pm
EF
May 18, 2008, 11:42 pm
State Farm gary
May 17, 2008, 5:49 am
RE: Shame Kevin Kennedy
May 16, 2008, 12:09 pm
RE: Shame Walter Jones
May 16, 2008, 11:16 am
RE: Subro claims clms
May 16, 2008, 8:11 am
RE: RE: ShameState Farm seems to have reckless indifference
May 16, 2008, 12:55 am
RE: Shame
May 16, 2008, 12:52 am
Shame
May 16, 2008, 12:49 am
Only In California Dread
May 15, 2008, 2:23 pm
Subro claims Kevin Kennedy
May 15, 2008, 1:42 pm
RE: next time... Bill
May 15, 2008, 1:37 pm
next time... Joe Blow
May 15, 2008, 1:30 pm
Car rental class action in California rdc
May 15, 2008, 1:23 pm
RE: its always been that way, nothing has changed, ben around 4awhile
May 15, 2008, 1:12 pm
RE: RE: Shame on IJ for printing this!!! Mr. Obvious
May 15, 2008, 12:57 pm
RE: RE: Shame on IJ for printing this!!! matt
May 15, 2008, 12:52 pm
RE: Shame on IJ for printing this!!! Sheep Herder
May 15, 2008, 10:34 am
whats the benefit? hmm
May 15, 2008, 9:55 am
Shame on IJ for printing this!!! Matt
May 15, 2008, 8:33 am