Calif., Colorado Consider Banning ‘Crash Taxes’

By Patricia-Anne Tom | February 23, 2011

Legislators in both California and Colorado have proposed new laws that would prohibit communities from charging a fee when police and fire personnel respond to motor vehicle accidents.

The city of Sacramento recently adopted just such a “fire recovery charge” on out of town automobile drivers. Sacramento’s “crash tax” imposes a fee on out-of-town drivers who get into auto accidents in order to fund the fire department’s response services. The fee would be imposed on non-resident drivers if insurers find them at fault in the accident. But business owners who live outside the city but have property inside the city are exempt from the tax.

But Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Moorpark, who introduced Senate Bill 49, banning such crash taxes, said

“The availability and use of emergency response resources throughout the state is an issue of statewide concern and not a municipal affair,” he said, noting it is unfair to penalize residents who live in surrounding communities but travel to down towns to work. Thus, his bill would prohibit a city, including a charter city, county, district, municipal corporation, or public authority from charging a fee to any person, regardless of residency, for the expense of an emergency response.

Colorado House Bill 1059, would similarly ban local governments from imposing a fee or seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by police officers, firefighters, and other first responders in connection with responding to a motor vehicle accident, with exceptions for certain costs for cleaning up hazardous materials and costs incurred in connection with providing ambulance service.

A recent Harris Interactive poll on crash taxes for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America found the majority of consumers believe their taxes cover the time and services provided by emergency response providers following a traffic accident and additional accident response fees charged by local governments are not necessary.

“There is strong public opposition across the country to this new trend of charging accident response fees,” said Robert Passmore, senior director, personal lines for PCI.

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • February 24, 2011 at 10:47 am
    caffiend says:
    On a side note, many insurance companies also won't pay the 'crash tax' as it's not part of the contract.
  • February 23, 2011 at 4:49 pm
    Bob says:
    Generally communities rely on insurance companies for the payment of these fees, what they do not think through is that this fee may still get applied to them through the back... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features