Pot Workplace Law Will Get Review From Colorado Supreme Court January 30, 2014 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 4 Comments January 30, 2014 at 1:13 pm Monica says: Like or Dislike: 0 0check it out… Reply January 30, 2014 at 3:11 pm Whooooaa...... says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Do they have a “designated smoking area”??? Reply January 30, 2014 at 2:35 pm GoldC says: Like or Dislike: 0 0I can see why impairment would be a requirement for termination, but who will make the determination whether it was medically necessary? Wouldn’t employers being privy to employees’ medical records qualify as HIPAA violations? Reply January 31, 2014 at 12:51 pm Libby says: Like or Dislike: 0 0I agree. If he was high on the job, it’s understandable. But it’s legal and he’s doing it off the clock. He should not have been fired. Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
check it out…
Do they have a “designated smoking area”???
I can see why impairment would be a requirement for termination, but who will make the determination whether it was medically necessary? Wouldn’t employers being privy to employees’ medical records qualify as HIPAA violations?
I agree. If he was high on the job, it’s understandable. But it’s legal and he’s doing it off the clock. He should not have been fired.