Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Dennison
(Hawaii Court of Appeals, Oct. 11, 2005)
Ruling: The insurer in this case filed a declaratory judgment action against its insured, alleging that it was not liable for emotional distress damages caused when the insured saw his son was being treated following an automobile accident. On appeal, the court vacated the lower court’s ruling in favor of the insured and held that because the insured was not in the vehicle with his son at the time of the accident, he could not maintain an independent claim against the insurer under the auto policy.
Topics Auto
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Manufacturers Hammer IBHS Over 15-Year Roof Age Limit for Fortified Designation
OpenAI Sued Over Claim That ChatGPT Drafted Lethal NC Poisoning Plan
Impersonation Top Scam Handled by Allstate
Insurtech Lemonade Posts $43.7M Loss for Q3 


