Pagarigan v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California Inc.
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 25, 2005)
Ruling: At issue on this appeal was the liability of a health maintenance organization, which contracts out its healthcare responsibilities to various providers, when one or more of those providers denies medically necessary services or commits malpractice in the delivery of those services. The court concluded that the HMO owes a duty to avoid contracting with deficient providers or negotiating contract terms that require or duly encourage denials of service or below standard performance by its providers.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
New York State Has Budget Deal That Includes Auto Insurance Reforms: Gov. Hochul
Hedge Funds Make Their Move as Litigation Finance Assets Slump
Florida, Louisiana Insurer Safepoint Reveals 97% Revenue Surge in IPO filing
Uber and FedEx Get Green Light for Racketeering Suit Against Lawyers, Doctors 


