State regulators, insurer trades spar at Congressional hearing on insurer investments

October 9, 2006

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners President and Maine Insurance Superintendent Alessandro A. Iuppa told a House Financial Services Subcommittee panel last month that strong financial regulation of insurance companies is essential to consumer protection and state officials are committed to an open, transparent process for accurately analyzing insurers’ investments.

“Without the consumer protection afforded by strong financial regulation, an insurance policy may not be worth the paper it is written on,” Iuppa said. “State insurance officials serve the public by means of independent and honest financial oversight to safeguard insurers’ capacity to pay claims.”

Iuppa welcomed congressional interest in the NAIC’s recent decisions on hybrid securities, which are highly complex, often customized, non-conventional and constantly evolving financial instruments.

“We stand by our recent analysis, both in the substance and the process,” he said. “Although some asserted that our reclassification of a relatively small number of securities would have dire consequences, we have uncovered no insurer that would become financially impaired or unable to meet the minimum capital and surplus level required by our risk-based capital formula as a result of these decisions.”

Not everyone agreed with Iuppa’s position.

The Washington, D.C.-based American Insurance Association voiced its concern and told the subcommittee that examining how insurer investments are regulated by the states points to the vitally important need for comprehensive reform of the state regulatory system.

The AIA said the authority to examine investments is carried out, in part, through the SVO, a service agency for regulators. The SVO provides analysis and important information to regulators regarding the investments held by insurers.

“Because of this fact, the SVO’s policies and procedures can materially affect insurers’ investment strategies,” said Phillip Carson, AIA assistant general counsel. “Transparency is as much an overriding principle for effective regulation of the insurance industry as it is for allowing the capital markets to function properly,” Carson said. “The NAIC and the SVO should understand that their actions impact other participants in the capital markets.”

The Illinois-based Property Casualty Insurers Association of America supported the efforts of Iuppa. “In something as important as valuing the securities insurers hold in their portfolios, having transparency and equal access to information are vital to all participants in the market,” said Gregory W. Heidrich, senior vice president, Policy Development and Research.

The NAIC, led by the New York Department of Insurance, continues to evaluate the appropriate risk-based capital treatment of hybrid securities to develop a permanent solution.

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal West October 9, 2006
October 9, 2006
Insurance Journal West Magazine

The Future for Agents\’ E & O