Federal lawmakers met recently to discuss the possibility of allowing insurance companies to have the option to be regulated by the federal government as opposed to the current system of state regulation, according to the Washington Post. The issue continues to divide insurers, some of whom were present at the meeting in support of federal regulation. They told a House Financial Services committee that larger, national companies would likely benefit from a standardized set of regulations. Those opposed to such plan argued that insurance is a local product that is best served by regional oversight. The Post noted that much of the support in favor of federal regulation comes from the life insurance sector. Two bills have been introduced to create a new federal regulatory system, but both are lacking support to move forward. One, introduced by Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), models the banking industry’s’ dual state-federal regulatory system, giving insurance companies the option to choose between state and federal regulation. The other, introduced by Rep. John J. LaFalce (D-N.Y.), proposes the creation of an optional federal charter for insurance companies, but keeps agents and brokers under state regulation.
Topics Legislation
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
One of Highest Property Claims Severity Recorded in Q3 on Low Volume, Says Verisk
Dunkin’ Cashier in Georgia, Stabbed by Rapper, Can’t Claim More Than Workers’ Comp
Acrisure CEO Greg Williams Makes $400M Commitment to Michigan State University
Surveys Show Concerns About Florida Market, But Consumers Are Warming Up 


