An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Catastrophe Bond Investors Told to Brace for Jamaica Payout
Florida Appeals Court Reverses $200M Jury Verdict in Maya Kowalski Case
Starr Acquiring IQUW; Starr Managing Agency to Be Among 10 Largest at Lloyd’s
Progressive Now 4th Largest Global Insurer; RenRe Fastest Growing in ’24 


