An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
What Happens to Property Pricing in ’27, Insurance, Reinsurance Execs Ask
Intersecting Risks and the Future of Construction Insurance
Endless Shrimp Deal Was Scheme to Squeeze Red Lobster, Suit Says
Florida’s Unemployment Rate Is Surging Even as High-Profile Companies Move In 


