An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Dubai Flights Disrupted After Drones Injure Four Near Main Airport
CRC Group CEO on Casualty: ‘It’s More About the Coverage’ Than Price
Fund Trying to Turn New Mexico Desert into an Advanced Tech Hub
Travelers Stranded by War Learn Insurance Won’t Cover Flight Cancellations 


