An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Worst Start to Wildfire Season Raises Alarm as El NiƱo Threatens
Ex-NFL Player Sentenced to 16 Years in Prison for $200M Medicare Fraud Scheme
US Efforts to End Iran War Stumble as Ship Seized Near UAE
Florida Governor Signs Bill Dropping Building Permits for Work Valued at $7,500 or Less 


