An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
NAIC Victim of Cyber Incident Via PeopleSoft System
What Happens to Property Pricing in ’27, Insurance, Reinsurance Execs Ask
A Super Yacht Armada Came to Miami, Leaving a Marine Graveyard in Its Wake
Florida-Based Safepoint Withdraws IPO Just as it Was Expected to Launch 


