An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Commercial Lines Market Overall Remains Firm, Says Ivans
Why Power Outages Do More Economic Damage Than We Think
LA Fire Survivors Got a Rude Surprise That Could Hit More Americans
Progressive Q4 Income Up 25%; CFO Sauerland to Retire in July 


