An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Two Dead at Tampa Office After Man Drove Car into Building and Started Shooting
LA Port Strike Risk Pushed to Friday as Labor Talks Continue
Allstate Q3 Net Income Drops About 45% on Higher Catastrophe Losses
Allstate’s AI Ecosystem to Include a Personal Agentic Assistant for Customers 


