An Illinois appeals court has rejected a plaintiff’s claim that its auto insurer breached its contract by refusing to pay for diminished value in an auto repair case, Martin v. State Farm. “Although the appeals court decision doesn’t throw out the concept of diminished value, it upholds the fact that the insurer could not have broken its contract with the plaintiff since diminished value is not covered under the insurance contract,” said Laura Kotelman, regional manager and senior counsel for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). PCI filed an amicus brief in the case.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Kroger Plans to Slash 37% of Corporate Jobs in Next Three Years
Friend of Suspected FBI Data Thief: ‘Crazy’ Teen Warned Not to Hack Bureau
Eastern States’ Grocers Shut Online Systems After Cyberattack
Europe’s Insurers Cut Coverage of Weather Losses, Report Says 


