Massachusetts Insurance Commisioner Julianne Bowler’s decision setting private passenger auto insurance rates for 2004 has been upheld by the state Supreme Judicial Court. A minor portion dealing with premiums for optional bodily injury coverage was remanded, however, for reconsideration by the Division of Insurance although no change is required. Attorney General Tom Reilly had challenged the rate decision, claiming that Bowler erred in her selection of underwriting profit methodology, in setting premiums for increased bodily injury limits, and in denying discovery into independent agency expenses. The court concluded that Bowler’s choice of an underwriting profits model that uses insurers’ internal rates of return “is adequately explained and reasonably supported by evidence.” It further found that the Attorney General’s motion to compel discovery of agency expenses to be moot regarding bodily injury coverage rates, but remanded the part of the decision that established premiums for optional bodily injury coverage for reconsideration.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Kyle Busch and Wife Settle Lawsuit With Pacific Life and Insurance Agent
Georgia Appeals Court Reverses $345M Judgment Against Insurers in School Sex Abuse
CRC Group CEO on Casualty: ‘It’s More About the Coverage’ Than Price
Travelers Stranded by War Learn Insurance Won’t Cover Flight Cancellations 


