Massachusetts Insurance Commisioner Julianne Bowler’s decision setting private passenger auto insurance rates for 2004 has been upheld by the state Supreme Judicial Court. A minor portion dealing with premiums for optional bodily injury coverage was remanded, however, for reconsideration by the Division of Insurance although no change is required. Attorney General Tom Reilly had challenged the rate decision, claiming that Bowler erred in her selection of underwriting profit methodology, in setting premiums for increased bodily injury limits, and in denying discovery into independent agency expenses. The court concluded that Bowler’s choice of an underwriting profits model that uses insurers’ internal rates of return “is adequately explained and reasonably supported by evidence.” It further found that the Attorney General’s motion to compel discovery of agency expenses to be moot regarding bodily injury coverage rates, but remanded the part of the decision that established premiums for optional bodily injury coverage for reconsideration.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Acrisure Goes After Former Owners of Businesses it Acquired for Leaving to Compete
Georgia Brokers and Agents Alarmed After Court Ruling Expands Liability for Them
AI Savings Misses ‘Should Be Making Executives Uncomfortable,’ Bain Says
Amazon’s Ring Sued Over Facial Recognition Feature 


