Massachusetts Insurance Commisioner Julianne Bowler’s decision setting private passenger auto insurance rates for 2004 has been upheld by the state Supreme Judicial Court. A minor portion dealing with premiums for optional bodily injury coverage was remanded, however, for reconsideration by the Division of Insurance although no change is required. Attorney General Tom Reilly had challenged the rate decision, claiming that Bowler erred in her selection of underwriting profit methodology, in setting premiums for increased bodily injury limits, and in denying discovery into independent agency expenses. The court concluded that Bowler’s choice of an underwriting profits model that uses insurers’ internal rates of return “is adequately explained and reasonably supported by evidence.” It further found that the Attorney General’s motion to compel discovery of agency expenses to be moot regarding bodily injury coverage rates, but remanded the part of the decision that established premiums for optional bodily injury coverage for reconsideration.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Buffett Steps Down as Berkshire Chair, Ending Six-Decade Run
The Big Data/AI ‘Revolution’ Is Driving Up Verdicts, Settlements as Plaintiffs Buy In
New York Contractor Charged with $160K Workers’ Comp Insurance Fraud
New York Law Confirms Insurer Liability for Bad Faith Includes Third-Party Claims 


