New York: Workers’ Comp Insurers Can Stop Security Fund Payments

By | May 2, 2008

Workers’ compensation insurers in New York can cease making payments into the state’s security fund for that coverage, now that the fund has amassed at least $74 million in assets, the Insurance Department said.

By statute, the department can suspend the requirement that insurers pay into the fund once it has reached that minimum threshold. However, if assets fall below that level in the future, payments will once again be required.

The fund is meant to guarantee claims to injured workers in the even of an insurer’s insolvency. Normally insurers pay up to 2 percent of their net written premiums each quarter into the fund

The suspension of payments affects insurers’ contributions for the first quarter of 2008, which would normally be due by May 15.

The self-sufficient status of the fund is a far cry from where it stood barely three years ago, as regulators, lawmakers and insurers scrambled to ensure its solvency.

In February 2005, the security fund had about $1 million in assets but $7.5 million in claims and expenses, and was paying claims to more than 7,500 claimants.

As part of a legislative package to ensure its solvency, insurers’ payments into the fund were doubled.

Topics Carriers Workers' Compensation New York

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • May 7, 2008 at 10:08 am
    mcheck57 says:
    The Lawsuit was brought by First Cardinal on behalf of the Business Council's self insurance trusts. It would seem that the carriers would be up in arms as they make less mone... read more
  • May 7, 2008 at 8:31 am
    fundman says:
    Right but wrong mcheck. You're right that it has nothing to do with the State Insurance fund, however the security fund they are referring to has mandated contributions from c... read more
  • May 5, 2008 at 8:55 am
    mcheck57 says:
    This has nothing to do with the State Insurance Fund. This relates to self insureds. The fund increase was to make up for the inability of the self insured's trusts to pay cla... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (5)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features