New Jersey’s Supreme Court has denied a drive-by shooting victim’s attempt to have her car insurer reimburse her under uninsured motorist coverage.
Camie Livsey was leaving a grocery store in Irvington four years ago when she was shot.
Witnesses saw an older Toyota speeding from the scene, though it was not determined if the shots were fired from the car.
Livsey’s claim was denied by Mercury Insurance. Livsey sued Mercury, saying it was reasonable to expect a drive-by shooting in a high-crime area could involve an uninsured motorist.
An appeals court had reversed a trial judge’s ruling against Livsey.
The Supreme Court ruled by a 4-3 majority to uphold the trial judge’s decision.
Livsey’s attorney didn’t return an Associated Press call seeking comment on Thursday.
Topics New Jersey
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Florida Grand Jury Finds DeSantis Admin Misused $10M; Yaworsky Signed Off on it 
Meta Agrees to Pay Up to $18 Billion Over Social Media Claims 
State Farm Must Give Up Trade Secrets in Claims Lawsuits, but Under Court Review 
How One Florida Gas Station Worker Allegedly Defrauded Progressive of $44,700 
