Connecticut Court Holds Teen Liable for Party Damage

July 19, 2011

The Connecticut Supreme Court says a teenager must pay restitution for damage at an unauthorized house party even though he did not personally cause any of the destruction.

The court’s unanimous ruling determined the trial court was within its rights to order the teen to pay $2,000 to the homeowners, whose Fairfield house sustained more than $36,000 in damage during the 2007 bash.

The teen’s name was not released because he was deemed a youthful offender. Twenty-one other teens also were charged and ordered to pay for damage at the home, which was unoccupied because it was up for sale.

The high court said the restitution order was legal because it required him to take responsibility for being there without permission, even though he did not participate in the vandalism.

Topics Connecticut

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • July 27, 2011 at 2:27 pm
    GL GURU says:
    At any rate, he was a PARTY to the crime.
  • July 21, 2011 at 9:21 pm
    GregCW says:
    Being there does not make him an accessory. NOT doing something to either stop or minimize the vandalism does.
  • July 20, 2011 at 8:47 am
    Jester says:
    Heidi, If you're there when a crim is comitted, you are an accessory. Maybe the kid will learn an important lesson. How would you feel if a bunch of young punks did $36,000 da... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (7)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features